Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Severus Alexander, post: 2882683, member: 84744&quot;]I think this would be fun to try by year... I bet we could probably manage &quot;within a year of&quot; pretty well for a large range.&nbsp; Going backwards would make sense, and for the early BC years we might have to switch to 5 or 10 year spans.</p><p><br /></p><p>I would be game if one of our medievalists wanted to start us off.&nbsp; Maybe at the year 1499?</p><p><br /></p><p>Suggested rules:</p><p>If nobody gets the exact year of issue within 6 hours of the previous post, move to &quot;within a year&quot; (e.g. for 1499, anything securely dateable to the 1498-1500 range would work).</p><p>If nobody gets &quot;within a year&quot; for 12h, move to &quot;within 5 years&quot;.</p><p>If nobody gets &quot;within 5 years&quot; for 24h, move to &quot;within 10 years&quot;.</p><p>(or something like that.)</p><p>Note: The possible days of the coin&#039;s minting can&#039;t just overlap with the range, but must fall entirely within it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in