I know a lot of coins were cranked out at Siscia, but many of the coins struck there are very nice in detail. Yours is no different Scotts
Scotts1's coin is special to me because of the IVN in the obverse legend. This was usually reserved for cases where there was a senior ruler with the same name but there was only one Crispus and this is an unusual usage I would like to have in my collection.
I agree. The condition of the coin has a lot more relevance to the price than a minor legend variation that only strange people would appreciate. I might pay several hundred for a coin of Crispus with IVN clearly in the legend but what we all missed here is that the coin has a hard enough to read legend that we accepted the tag saying Crispus without looking at the coin which actually reads LICINIVS IVN NOB C. That makes it a lower grade example of Licinius II whose coins are less in demand than just about anyone's. I am horridly embarrassed that I let this one slip by the first time but this old fool regularly slips up and assumes incorrectly.
Well, that's disappointing, but at least I know what it really is now. I didn't make that tag, it came from a dealer at a coin show who probably just got it confused. They do look very similar. Thanks for your help!
The OP's coin is razor sharp & silvered. Before seeing the OP coin, I thought that my example was pretty sharp. CRISPUS Caesar 317-326 AD (Son of Constantine) AE3 (19 mm diameter) Siscia mint. Similar to Sear #3918 Obv: IVL CRISPVS NOB C Laureate head facing right Rev: CAESARVM NOSTRORVM Laurel wreath around (VOT - X), HSIS in exergue.
Usually I am not really a fan of silvering on a lot of the coins but in this case I find it quite attractive. What a beautifully struck coin. When reading I had a preconceived notion of what a 'sunburst' was and I had to go and look it up. To me a sunburst is synonymous with solar flare. The first thing that came to mind wasn't a sun with the rays coming out as was pointed out to me by google.