Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient Coin Cons Going Mainstream?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Orielensis, post: 3880653, member: 96898"]Yes, but it's still a fair question to ask. On the one hand, the value of ancient coins is always based only on what a collector is willing to pay. I'm quite glad that there is no "Red Book" fo ancients. It forces people to think about what they enjoy in a coin rather than about what it's worth according to some catalogue. That's a good thing, I reckon.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the other hand, here are my reasons for having paid $20 for each of the coins above. Both are in high grade, have good surfaces and full legends, and don't miss major parts of the design. That's my entry requirements for considering to buy common LRBs.</p><p><br /></p><p>The first coin gets quite a couple of extra points for the expressively brutal portrait and the excellent facial detail on Sol. The flan flaw is a slight minus, but doesn't bother me that much. The coin's color is unremarkable, and the Rome mint is nothing special in my book.</p><p><br /></p><p>The second coin gets minus points for lack of facial detail on Sol. For me, this is partly outweighed by an attractive two-tone patina and a good London style portrait. What finally made me buy it at $20 is the mint, though. Due to the historical significance of these places for Constantine's career, I'm willing to pay a small premium or accept minor detail flaws in early LRBs from London and Trier. Everybody is free to disagree with that, of course.</p><p><br /></p><p>If I had to choose only one, I'd probably take the first coin. Yet, who says I can't have two nice Constantines with a Sol reverse? As a matter of fact, I even have three. By chance, the third was also about $20, and I bought it mostly for Constantine's mean crooked nose. Did I overpay for that one? Maybe. Am I unhappy with it? Nope.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1025072[/ATTACH]</p><p><font size="3">Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE3, 313 AD, Rome mint. Obv: IMP CONSTANTINVS P F AVG; bust of Constantine I, laureate, draped, cuirassed, r, Rev: SOLI INVICTO COMITI; Sol, radiate, chlamys draped across r. shoulder, standing l., raising r. hand and holding globe in l. hand. 19.5mm, 3.41g. Ref: RIC VII Rome 2.</font>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Orielensis, post: 3880653, member: 96898"]Yes, but it's still a fair question to ask. On the one hand, the value of ancient coins is always based only on what a collector is willing to pay. I'm quite glad that there is no "Red Book" fo ancients. It forces people to think about what they enjoy in a coin rather than about what it's worth according to some catalogue. That's a good thing, I reckon. On the other hand, here are my reasons for having paid $20 for each of the coins above. Both are in high grade, have good surfaces and full legends, and don't miss major parts of the design. That's my entry requirements for considering to buy common LRBs. The first coin gets quite a couple of extra points for the expressively brutal portrait and the excellent facial detail on Sol. The flan flaw is a slight minus, but doesn't bother me that much. The coin's color is unremarkable, and the Rome mint is nothing special in my book. The second coin gets minus points for lack of facial detail on Sol. For me, this is partly outweighed by an attractive two-tone patina and a good London style portrait. What finally made me buy it at $20 is the mint, though. Due to the historical significance of these places for Constantine's career, I'm willing to pay a small premium or accept minor detail flaws in early LRBs from London and Trier. Everybody is free to disagree with that, of course. If I had to choose only one, I'd probably take the first coin. Yet, who says I can't have two nice Constantines with a Sol reverse? As a matter of fact, I even have three. By chance, the third was also about $20, and I bought it mostly for Constantine's mean crooked nose. Did I overpay for that one? Maybe. Am I unhappy with it? Nope. [ATTACH=full]1025072[/ATTACH] [SIZE=3]Constantine I, Roman Empire, AE3, 313 AD, Rome mint. Obv: IMP CONSTANTINVS P F AVG; bust of Constantine I, laureate, draped, cuirassed, r, Rev: SOLI INVICTO COMITI; Sol, radiate, chlamys draped across r. shoulder, standing l., raising r. hand and holding globe in l. hand. 19.5mm, 3.41g. Ref: RIC VII Rome 2.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient Coin Cons Going Mainstream?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...