Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient Attribution Practice #2
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2698608, member: 19463"]Victor<b> is</b> right! Many misattributions we see result from folks deriving numbers from comparisons with coins they found posted somewhere or from using the cheat sheets without understanding what differences caused the coins to be assigned the different numbers. To use RIC effectively, you really need to compare your coin to listings on pages before and after to see what differences turn up. RIC is not consistent on how they handle a dot more or less here or there. Buying the books is only the first step. You may find the $1000+ cheap compared to the 1000+ hours of study needed to get comfortable with all the tricks that are beneficial in using all that information. </p><p> </p><p><br /></p><p>I really believe more collectors would get more enjoyment out of the hobby if they put off worrying about whether their coin was bust B4 or B5 until they are ready to declare a specialty interest and have seen enough specimens to understand the terms as they are used in that particular section of that particular volume of the reference. Just because some of us care about a bust 'seen from the back' as opposed to 'seen from the front' does not mean you have to and certainly does not mean you should pay double for one or the other.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2698608, member: 19463"]Victor[B] is[/B] right! Many misattributions we see result from folks deriving numbers from comparisons with coins they found posted somewhere or from using the cheat sheets without understanding what differences caused the coins to be assigned the different numbers. To use RIC effectively, you really need to compare your coin to listings on pages before and after to see what differences turn up. RIC is not consistent on how they handle a dot more or less here or there. Buying the books is only the first step. You may find the $1000+ cheap compared to the 1000+ hours of study needed to get comfortable with all the tricks that are beneficial in using all that information. I really believe more collectors would get more enjoyment out of the hobby if they put off worrying about whether their coin was bust B4 or B5 until they are ready to declare a specialty interest and have seen enough specimens to understand the terms as they are used in that particular section of that particular volume of the reference. Just because some of us care about a bust 'seen from the back' as opposed to 'seen from the front' does not mean you have to and certainly does not mean you should pay double for one or the other.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Ancient Attribution Practice #2
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...