Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Insider, post: 2683416, member: 24314&quot;]baseball21, posted: &quot;There&#039;s some that some people would consider AU 58s. Some of which are attributed to the fact that <span style="color: #b300b3">various people just disagree how storage methods that impacted the surface should impact a grade and others have <b>disagreements</b> over what is <b>wear</b> and what is a <b>poor strike</b>,...&quot;</span></p><p><span style="color: #b300b3"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Another variable.&nbsp; However, with true technical grading that was done by professional numismatists using a stereomicroscope and florescent light at the services in DC (ANA &amp; INS) there was NO DISAGREEMENT between the two (rub/weak strike) <b>as any dunce could tell the difference</b>! </span></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><br /></span></p><p><span style="color: #000000">Additionally, in their &quot;ivory tower&quot; they had no regard to please any submitter, stretch grades, worry about income, play the game, etc.&nbsp; Unlike today when the budget at a major TPGS possibly is larger than some small countries in the world! </span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in