Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;panzerman, post: 3277062, member: 77704&quot;]I would say ANACS has some good points too....</p><p><br /></p><p>They have more complete data on coin/ PGGS/ NGC do not have enough descriptive info about coin in holder.</p><p>Also, they grade more conservative, an ANACS MS-60 looks as good as a PGGS/ NGC MS-62</p><p>Same as old PGGS green/blue holders are better quality grades.</p><p>But the Canadian firm CCCS has best looking holder/ best grading standards. I had a previously graded MS-65 (NGC) get a MS-62. This form grades along European standards.</p><p>However they also come short on providing enough data.</p><p>John[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in