Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;GDJMSP, post: 1815653, member: 112&quot;]No, it is not !</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>That is what I would call a &quot;leftover&quot; belief. I say leftover because there was a time when ANACS was fairly well respected company, and many people remember that. They look at ANACS as being the same company that it was years ago because they are not aware of the changes that have taken place. ANACS has been bought and sold many times, and each time it was sold the company&#039;s grading standards were changed, and usually not for the better.</p><p><br /></p><p>In today&#039;s world ANACS is looked upon by people who know what they are doing as being equal to ICG, with neither one being worthy of any respect when it comes to grading coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now some folks just refuse to believe that because they remember the old ANACS. Well, that&#039;s why the new buyer kept the company name, so that could be played upon, counted on, to retain old customers and hopefully garner new ones. Had the company&#039;s name changed to something new, everything would have been different. There would be no familiarity, the new name would be suspect and the coins they graded looked upon with much greater scrutiny.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coins themselves are the evidence, look at them, compare them and you will quickly see that respect is not warranted.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in