Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An upgraded labyrinth
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="AncientJoe, post: 2980084, member: 44357"]Thanks everyone!</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>It is really a matter of "minimalism" to some extent. I anticipate having a collection of no more than ~150-200 coins in its entirety and have almost all of antiquity to cover with that small of a set. Now, that range can be considered somewhat arbitrary, and I'm not as rigorous as some people who only want a "box of 20", but a limited overall quantity means there isn't as much room for iconographic duplicates.</p><p><br /></p><p>Similarly, I now only have an Alexander the Great gold distater rather than also having a stater. They're almost indistinguishable unless you weigh them but once you have the distater, the stater isn't really "essential".</p><p><br /></p><p>I could end up kicking myself for taking this approach, and indeed, I've sold some coins after upgrading them and later found that I missed some aspect of the earlier example but it forces me to look for coins that add something to my collection, whether historic or aesthetic, rather than it just being a nice coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Many people end up going the opposite direction and collecting one of each denomination of a particular type, or even down to die varieties in US coinage, all of which is a perfectly valid and enjoyable collecting style: it just is counter to what I'm currently aiming for... although in the fullness of time, I certainly won't rule it out <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="AncientJoe, post: 2980084, member: 44357"]Thanks everyone! It is really a matter of "minimalism" to some extent. I anticipate having a collection of no more than ~150-200 coins in its entirety and have almost all of antiquity to cover with that small of a set. Now, that range can be considered somewhat arbitrary, and I'm not as rigorous as some people who only want a "box of 20", but a limited overall quantity means there isn't as much room for iconographic duplicates. Similarly, I now only have an Alexander the Great gold distater rather than also having a stater. They're almost indistinguishable unless you weigh them but once you have the distater, the stater isn't really "essential". I could end up kicking myself for taking this approach, and indeed, I've sold some coins after upgrading them and later found that I missed some aspect of the earlier example but it forces me to look for coins that add something to my collection, whether historic or aesthetic, rather than it just being a nice coin. Many people end up going the opposite direction and collecting one of each denomination of a particular type, or even down to die varieties in US coinage, all of which is a perfectly valid and enjoyable collecting style: it just is counter to what I'm currently aiming for... although in the fullness of time, I certainly won't rule it out :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An upgraded labyrinth
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...