Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;dougsmit, post: 2882647, member: 19463&quot;]Nothing that is covered by RIC volume V is really unlisted just because it is not in RIC.&nbsp; That volume is so out of date that not being there is almost normal.&nbsp;&nbsp; The same goes for certain other periods like the Eastern Severans.&nbsp; To be unlisted, a coin needs to be missing from not only the big standard works but also a pile of smaller, specialized studies that vary from period to period.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp; </p><p>Another question is whether you call a coin unlisted because of a really minor point.&nbsp; We currently have a thread on variations on the types with captives seated under a trophy of arms.&nbsp; Do you want to pay extra for a coin that differs from the listed variations by which captive is bound and which is holding his head in hand?&nbsp; Specialists care.&nbsp; Most collectors don&#039;t.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in