Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An "UNLISTED" Dupondius of Geta
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 5188238, member: 91820"][ATTACH=full]1213853[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1213854[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Geta Dupondius 12.76 grams, 25mm</p><p>Obverse inscription: P SEPT GETA PIUS AVG BRIT</p><p>Reverse Inscription: FORT RED TRP III COS II</p><p>Unlisted but would be near RIC 173</p><p><br /></p><p>In 20 years of buying, selling and collecting ancient coins I have come across few truly "unlisted" pre-268 AD imperial coins (around the last year of the traditional sestertius) - that is, a coin type completely missed by the authors of RIC. What I mean by unlisted is a type completely out of the books, not a coin with a slight difference on inscription, or a different bust style. About five years or so ago Numismatik Naumann posted for sale a completely unknown sestertius of Caracalla (price was WAY out of my league). I can't think of another example, but there have been others - but all in all the authors of RIC were pretty comprehensive.</p><p><br /></p><p>The coin I want to discuss is very much a known type, not only for Geta, but for his brother Caracalla as well. It was struck in 211, and presumably celebrates the successful conclusion of the British expedition. </p><p><br /></p><p>RIC does list the same type with the inscription, P SEPTIMIUS GETA PIUS AVG BRIT on the obverse and FORT RED TRP III COS II PP. Are these differences significant? Probably not. But it is an interesting coin that was purchased on ebay for $80 during that magical period of the early 2000's when ebay was a major selling place for ancient coins, and it was a buyer's market. I wish someone would write about this period, and tell me where all those coins went. I recall going to the New York show in 2003 or maybe 2004, and seeing enormous quantities of imperial folles (folli?), and bag after bag of other types - Greek, Roman etc. That was around the first year of the Moneta bulletin board and there was so much enthusiasm for collecting ancients. But I digress.</p><p><br /></p><p>There are a number of other coins I want to post so I will end this here.</p><p><br /></p><p>PS - I looked for the Naumann coin, which showed, among other things, a sacrificial scene, on ACSEARCH, and could not find it - perhaps it was not genuine?</p><p><br /></p><p>I have to once more mention Doug Smith's excellent article on unlisted coins on the FORUM site. It is worth mentioning again that Mr. Smith's articles on ancient coins are the best introduction to the hobby, and an excellent resource. I go back to them again and again.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Blake Davis, post: 5188238, member: 91820"][ATTACH=full]1213853[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]1213854[/ATTACH] Geta Dupondius 12.76 grams, 25mm Obverse inscription: P SEPT GETA PIUS AVG BRIT Reverse Inscription: FORT RED TRP III COS II Unlisted but would be near RIC 173 In 20 years of buying, selling and collecting ancient coins I have come across few truly "unlisted" pre-268 AD imperial coins (around the last year of the traditional sestertius) - that is, a coin type completely missed by the authors of RIC. What I mean by unlisted is a type completely out of the books, not a coin with a slight difference on inscription, or a different bust style. About five years or so ago Numismatik Naumann posted for sale a completely unknown sestertius of Caracalla (price was WAY out of my league). I can't think of another example, but there have been others - but all in all the authors of RIC were pretty comprehensive. The coin I want to discuss is very much a known type, not only for Geta, but for his brother Caracalla as well. It was struck in 211, and presumably celebrates the successful conclusion of the British expedition. RIC does list the same type with the inscription, P SEPTIMIUS GETA PIUS AVG BRIT on the obverse and FORT RED TRP III COS II PP. Are these differences significant? Probably not. But it is an interesting coin that was purchased on ebay for $80 during that magical period of the early 2000's when ebay was a major selling place for ancient coins, and it was a buyer's market. I wish someone would write about this period, and tell me where all those coins went. I recall going to the New York show in 2003 or maybe 2004, and seeing enormous quantities of imperial folles (folli?), and bag after bag of other types - Greek, Roman etc. That was around the first year of the Moneta bulletin board and there was so much enthusiasm for collecting ancients. But I digress. There are a number of other coins I want to post so I will end this here. PS - I looked for the Naumann coin, which showed, among other things, a sacrificial scene, on ACSEARCH, and could not find it - perhaps it was not genuine? I have to once more mention Doug Smith's excellent article on unlisted coins on the FORUM site. It is worth mentioning again that Mr. Smith's articles on ancient coins are the best introduction to the hobby, and an excellent resource. I go back to them again and again.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An "UNLISTED" Dupondius of Geta
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...