Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An interesting talk by Clive Stannard
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 3121433, member: 93416"]I have questions about the suggested Stannard procedure for weight adjustment - mainly because it does not seem to me to lead to a sensible way to make coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>The main point to al marco is to save time at the mint by knocking out a fixed number of coins from a fixed weight of silver, without bothering too much about the variation coin to coin. (See Grierson on this)</p><p><br /></p><p>Here is my alternative suggestion. At the point of delivery to the mint silver bullion is weighed, and the owner is given a chit stating the number of coins he is to receive. Now 500g was the standard mina of Persia and also widely adopted as a commercial pound around the ancient Mediterranean. Quite possibly bullion was received or made into 500g bars at the Rome mint, which were then cut up in a binary fashion. (This binary cutting method seems to be something many mints have done, over millennia). So you make 128 denarii by this simple al Marco serial halving method - at c. 3.9g each - which is what we see.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now let us suppose from time to time in the mint some butter-fingered guy dropped a coin, (or some light-fingered guy swiped one, or someone just fluffed his sums). Bound to happen, I would say. At the end of that process then, you have a guy coming round shortly to the mint with a chit for (say) 128 coins, and you only have 127 to give him. Panic stations. You hastily chisel a bit of silver from a rather random bunch of the 127, until you have about 3.9g. You make up the numbers with a denarius from your own pocket, but set the bag of bits to one side to recompense yourself down the line.</p><p><br /></p><p>As I read it, Stannard only finds this chiselling on about 2.5% of the coins, across the board. That does not seem to me to fit with any general scheme to adjust the weight of the coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>It does however fit with an occasional exercise in adjusting the number of coins.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="EWC3, post: 3121433, member: 93416"]I have questions about the suggested Stannard procedure for weight adjustment - mainly because it does not seem to me to lead to a sensible way to make coins. The main point to al marco is to save time at the mint by knocking out a fixed number of coins from a fixed weight of silver, without bothering too much about the variation coin to coin. (See Grierson on this) Here is my alternative suggestion. At the point of delivery to the mint silver bullion is weighed, and the owner is given a chit stating the number of coins he is to receive. Now 500g was the standard mina of Persia and also widely adopted as a commercial pound around the ancient Mediterranean. Quite possibly bullion was received or made into 500g bars at the Rome mint, which were then cut up in a binary fashion. (This binary cutting method seems to be something many mints have done, over millennia). So you make 128 denarii by this simple al Marco serial halving method - at c. 3.9g each - which is what we see. Now let us suppose from time to time in the mint some butter-fingered guy dropped a coin, (or some light-fingered guy swiped one, or someone just fluffed his sums). Bound to happen, I would say. At the end of that process then, you have a guy coming round shortly to the mint with a chit for (say) 128 coins, and you only have 127 to give him. Panic stations. You hastily chisel a bit of silver from a rather random bunch of the 127, until you have about 3.9g. You make up the numbers with a denarius from your own pocket, but set the bag of bits to one side to recompense yourself down the line. As I read it, Stannard only finds this chiselling on about 2.5% of the coins, across the board. That does not seem to me to fit with any general scheme to adjust the weight of the coins. It does however fit with an occasional exercise in adjusting the number of coins.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An interesting talk by Clive Stannard
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...