Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;TypeCoin971793, post: 3174732, member: 78244&quot;]I do not understand the meaning behind your intentionally-malicious, and completely incorrect remark.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Guess what was in my pocket change. All moderns. Guess what is in everyone’s pocket change. Moderns. Guess what, Morgans are common, especially 1921’s. The thornhead is rare. But it is hardly special. A 1977 D Type C reverse is rare, but it is not special either. Moderns in general are common, with hundreds of millions produced each year. Sure there are rare varieties, but that does not make the issue as a whole any less common. </p><p><br /></p><p>Guess what? I attacked Morgans, the ubiquitous classic US coinage, and lumped them into the same category as moderns. I can name many “classic” issues that I will lump into the same “common” category. Sure, many of those have rare varieties, but that does not make them any less common.</p><p><br /></p><p>I have nothing against moderns. But to say they are anything but common is fallacious. You have to apply many conditions to make them rare (die variety, strike, top end of the grade, etc.). If the coins were not common, then this filtering would hardly be necessary.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in