Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An Interesting Antoninianus of Tetricus II - An Apparently Unique Obverse
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="John Conduitt, post: 7836807, member: 109923"]Yes it does look barbarous, but as you say, a very good style. It's tricky because even the official issues were dreadful. I mean, despite the spelling mistakes it looks like your engraver knew how to read, which most barbarous engravers didn't seem to be able to do. Often they didn't even bother with actual letters. In that sense, they <i>all </i>have unique obverses, reverses and legends.</p><p><br /></p><p>How big is it? I think official coins are nearer 18mm or so. I don't know, but the pitting might be because the alloy was cheap, and some metals leached out quicker than others.</p><p><br /></p><p>The barbarous radiates I have from that time are much cruder, but I only collect those from Britain - it seems the counterfeiters in Britain were at an all-time low. I've seen barbarous radiates from the Continent that are much better.</p><p><br /></p><p>But the official issues weren't great either. This, I think, is an official version of your coin:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Tetricus II Antoninianus, 271-274</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1347413[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Cologne/Trier. Bronze, 18mm, 2.6g. C PIV ESV TETRICVS CAES. SPES AVGG (RIC V2 270).</b></p><p><br /></p><p>The bust is good but it looks like they engraved the legends and reverse with a penknife. Worse than yours, I think. You'd think it was too crude to be official - well, I did - until you see the barbarous issues:</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Tetricus of some sort, or maybe Claudius II, 270-280s</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1347408[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>'Bronze' 16mm, 2.4g. AEQ? </b>Reverse seems to be Aequitas, which might mean it's Claudius II, although the bust doesn't seem to have a beard. Or much of a face.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Tetricus I, 270-280s</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1347410[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Bronze, 15mm, 1.1g.</b> The reverse legend doesn't seem to offer any help in identifying the figure, but I think they have wings.</p><p><br /></p><p><b>Tetricus I, 270-280s</b></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1347411[/ATTACH]</p><p><b>Bronze, 10mm, 0.3g. Laetitia standing, holding rudder and cornucopea. </b>The legends are again no help. If they are indeed legends.</p><p><br /></p><p>So yours looks much closer to official than barbarous![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="John Conduitt, post: 7836807, member: 109923"]Yes it does look barbarous, but as you say, a very good style. It's tricky because even the official issues were dreadful. I mean, despite the spelling mistakes it looks like your engraver knew how to read, which most barbarous engravers didn't seem to be able to do. Often they didn't even bother with actual letters. In that sense, they [I]all [/I]have unique obverses, reverses and legends. How big is it? I think official coins are nearer 18mm or so. I don't know, but the pitting might be because the alloy was cheap, and some metals leached out quicker than others. The barbarous radiates I have from that time are much cruder, but I only collect those from Britain - it seems the counterfeiters in Britain were at an all-time low. I've seen barbarous radiates from the Continent that are much better. But the official issues weren't great either. This, I think, is an official version of your coin: [B]Tetricus II Antoninianus, 271-274[/B] [ATTACH=full]1347413[/ATTACH] [B]Cologne/Trier. Bronze, 18mm, 2.6g. C PIV ESV TETRICVS CAES. SPES AVGG (RIC V2 270).[/B] The bust is good but it looks like they engraved the legends and reverse with a penknife. Worse than yours, I think. You'd think it was too crude to be official - well, I did - until you see the barbarous issues: [B]Tetricus of some sort, or maybe Claudius II, 270-280s[/B] [ATTACH=full]1347408[/ATTACH] [B]'Bronze' 16mm, 2.4g. AEQ? [/B]Reverse seems to be Aequitas, which might mean it's Claudius II, although the bust doesn't seem to have a beard. Or much of a face. [B]Tetricus I, 270-280s[/B] [ATTACH=full]1347410[/ATTACH] [B]Bronze, 15mm, 1.1g.[/B] The reverse legend doesn't seem to offer any help in identifying the figure, but I think they have wings. [B]Tetricus I, 270-280s[/B] [ATTACH=full]1347411[/ATTACH] [B]Bronze, 10mm, 0.3g. Laetitia standing, holding rudder and cornucopea. [/B]The legends are again no help. If they are indeed legends. So yours looks much closer to official than barbarous![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An Interesting Antoninianus of Tetricus II - An Apparently Unique Obverse
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...