Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;CamaroDMD, post: 7466589, member: 5233&quot;]I&#039;m at a solid 65PL</p><p><br /></p><p>Surface preservation obverse/ reverse. Is there wear or none? Are there typical, distracting or no obvious distracting marks?&nbsp; <b>There is no wear.&nbsp; There are a couple dings on the coin but overall it is minimally baggy.&nbsp; Plus, due to the cameo effect...such marks tend to look exaggerated in photos.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Strike-obverse/reverse. Strong, average, weak, problematic. Key points of the coin that display strike, such as Eagle’s breast, hair, cap, etc..&nbsp; <b>Although not 100% fully struck, I would consider this coin have a very strong strike.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Luster- obverse/reverse. Brilliant, strong, medium, low, impaired - <b>Brilliant luster on this coin.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Eye appeal-obverse/reverse. Extraordinary, strong, good, average, below average, substandard. - <b>Very strong eye appeal here.</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Distractions and problems that would lower grade. Any special negatives? - <b>No, I see nothing problematic about this coin.&nbsp; It does look like it MIGHT have a minor die clash (which is not my thing).</b></p><p><br /></p><p>Assets that would raise grade. Die cracks, heavy frost, proof like surfaces, cameo, etc. - <b>nice frosting...PL for sure, might even be DMPL.</b>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in