Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Roerbakmix, post: 8084592, member: 100731&quot;]The depositions:</p><p>(obverse)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404428[/ATTACH]</p><p>Iron (brown), silver chloride (black, granular), and copper (green) depositions</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404429[/ATTACH]</p><p>Small mineral and sand depositions (above eye)</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404430[/ATTACH]</p><p>Iron oxide, silver chloride deposition</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404431[/ATTACH]</p><p>Silver chloride deposition</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404432[/ATTACH]</p><p>Flow lines (reverse) suggestive of strike, instead of cast fake (though this doesnt rule out a fake using modern dies). </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404437[/ATTACH]</p><p>Engraving method commonly used for sceatta&#039;s. I&#039;ve studied these thin engraving lines, but have not posted on it. Especially appearant on this Series E subvar e:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1404438[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>In conclusion: without seeing the pictures of your coin, I&#039;m not yet convinced my coin is a modern forgery as suggested. I am quite convinced that it is a contemporary imitation of the Danish series X.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in