Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An Astounding Brockage
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8249908, member: 84744"]My most unusual brockage is nowhere near as amazing as Doug's fabulous Magnentius, but it is still kinda neat, and certainly rare:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1453081[/ATTACH]</p><p>It's a <i>partial</i> brockage of a Saturninus denarius, whereby some other coin (the previously struck one? not necessarily) was resting, off-centre and reverse up, between the blank flan and the anvil die when this coin was struck.</p><p><br /></p><p>While partial brockages aren't that rare for modern coins produced by automation, they are decidedly rare for ancients. I can find only 10 clear cases on acsearch (2 Celtic, 3 Republican, 3 Imperial, 1 Roman provincial, and 1 Byzantine.) Compare that to 800 hits on "denarius brockage" alone.</p><p><br /></p><p>Question: given how common whole brockages are, why are partial brockages so rare? </p><p>Theory: it's far more likely for an interfering off-centre coin to be noticed than a stuck, centred coin. That wouldn't apply to automated production, which is why modern ones are much more common.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>I just did some work to make this more than anecdotal. Of that 800 hits for "denarius brockage" on acsearch, there are:</p><p><br /></p><p>Approx. <b>600</b> Republican: 184 years = <b>3.26 per year</b></p><p><b>59</b> Augustus - Nerva: 125 years = <b>0.47 per year</b></p><p><b>23</b> Trajan to Pertinax: 95 years = <b>0.24 per year</b></p><p><b>82</b> Septimius Severus to Gordian III: 51 years = <b>1.61 per year</b></p><p>(the remainder were excluded; not denarii, or duplicates, or whatever)</p><p><br /></p><p>To really know the brockage rate we'd have to know the total production (and survival rate), of course, which we don't. But going by Harl's <i>Coinage in the Roman Economy</i> production generally increased throughout this period, so the brockage rate for the Republic is clearly a lot higher.</p><p><br /></p><p>Clearly production standards must be one factor. I wonder if silver quality is another - the higher quality and therefore softer silver in the Republic may have been more likely to stick to the die. (Of course gold is even softer, but naturally they'd be more careful in producing the small mintages of gold.) Then again, the lowest silver quality is in the last group, but inflation meant production was a lot higher too, and quality control worse.</p><p><br /></p><p>Interestingly, there are only 100 hits for "antoninianus brockage." Of those 100, only 13 fall in the period from Caracalla to Valerian![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Severus Alexander, post: 8249908, member: 84744"]My most unusual brockage is nowhere near as amazing as Doug's fabulous Magnentius, but it is still kinda neat, and certainly rare: [ATTACH=full]1453081[/ATTACH] It's a [I]partial[/I] brockage of a Saturninus denarius, whereby some other coin (the previously struck one? not necessarily) was resting, off-centre and reverse up, between the blank flan and the anvil die when this coin was struck. While partial brockages aren't that rare for modern coins produced by automation, they are decidedly rare for ancients. I can find only 10 clear cases on acsearch (2 Celtic, 3 Republican, 3 Imperial, 1 Roman provincial, and 1 Byzantine.) Compare that to 800 hits on "denarius brockage" alone. Question: given how common whole brockages are, why are partial brockages so rare? Theory: it's far more likely for an interfering off-centre coin to be noticed than a stuck, centred coin. That wouldn't apply to automated production, which is why modern ones are much more common. I just did some work to make this more than anecdotal. Of that 800 hits for "denarius brockage" on acsearch, there are: Approx. [B]600[/B] Republican: 184 years = [B]3.26 per year 59[/B] Augustus - Nerva: 125 years = [B]0.47 per year 23[/B] Trajan to Pertinax: 95 years = [B]0.24 per year 82[/B] Septimius Severus to Gordian III: 51 years = [B]1.61 per year[/B] (the remainder were excluded; not denarii, or duplicates, or whatever) To really know the brockage rate we'd have to know the total production (and survival rate), of course, which we don't. But going by Harl's [I]Coinage in the Roman Economy[/I] production generally increased throughout this period, so the brockage rate for the Republic is clearly a lot higher. Clearly production standards must be one factor. I wonder if silver quality is another - the higher quality and therefore softer silver in the Republic may have been more likely to stick to the die. (Of course gold is even softer, but naturally they'd be more careful in producing the small mintages of gold.) Then again, the lowest silver quality is in the last group, but inflation meant production was a lot higher too, and quality control worse. Interestingly, there are only 100 hits for "antoninianus brockage." Of those 100, only 13 fall in the period from Caracalla to Valerian![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
An Astounding Brockage
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...