Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
(ambr0zie) Top 10 Roman Imperial Coins
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="ambr0zie, post: 8062828, member: 80952"]Although Christmas is coming in a month, I see other members have started providing their Top 10 coins. I have seen some beautiful examples already and I am sure I will see more.</p><p>This year was great from a numismatic point of view. It has been also the first year where I concentrated 99.9999% on ancients only, learning more and more, ... buying more and more and the only 2 purchases not related to ancient coins were 2 modern banknotes I wanted for years, both cheap.</p><p>It was very difficult to select only 10 coins - this is why I will create 2 lists, 1 for Roman Imperial coins and a list for Republican+Provincial+Greek. I bought a lot (mostly affordable coins) and it was difficult to select 10 coins only for Roman Imperial section. I had to relegate some coins that would have deserved a place, but I selected the coins I was extremely happy for getting and the ones I personally like the most.</p><p><br /></p><p>The order is the one I bought the coins in. Hope you will like them!</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Trajan Denarius - Victory and DACICA shield</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397603[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Trajan AD 98-117. Rome Denarius AR 20 mm., 2,96 g.</p><p>RIC II Trajan 130 </p><p>Date Range: AD 103 - AD 111</p><p>IMP TRAIANO AVG GER DAC P M TR P, bust of Trajan, laureate, right, draped on left shoulder/ COS V P P S P Q R OPTIMO PRINC, Victory, naked to hips, standing right, left foot set on a step, inscribing DACICA on shield attached to palm-tree</p><p><br /></p><p>This coin is important for me as it is related to Dacia. I wanted to buy some coins connected to Dacia and I have a few (missing some DAC CAPs but every attempt to get one failed, prices going too high). Particularly like Trajan's portrait and the overall look of the coin.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>2. Lucilla Denarius - Venus Victrix</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397606[/ATTACH]</p><p>Lucilla AD 164-182. Rome Denarius AR 18 mm., 2,89 g.</p><p>RIC III Marcus Aurelius 786 </p><p>Date Range: AD 164 - AD 180</p><p>LVCILLA AVGVSTA, bust of Lucilla, bare-headed, hair waved and fastened in a bun on back of head, draped, right / VENVS VICTRIX, Venus, draped with right breast bare, standing left, holding Victory in extended right hand and resting left hand on shield set on ground</p><p><br /></p><p>I try to get as many empresses as possible and this year a lot of new ones arrived in my albums. This was an impulse purchase but, even if the reverse is not perfect (although not bad!) the obverse was, for me, breathtaking, as the engraver did his job very good. I consider this one of the most beautiful coins in my collection.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>3. Divus Verus Denarius - Consecratio</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397611[/ATTACH]</p><p>Divus Lucius Verus AD 169. Rome, Denarius AR, 18 mm., 2,70 g.</p><p>RIC III Marcus Aurelius 596B; RSC 55, BMC 503</p><p>Date: AD 169</p><p>DIVVS VERVS, head of Lucius Verus, bare, right / CONSECRATIO, funeral pyre in four tiers, adorned with statues and garlands, quadriga on top</p><p><br /></p><p>The good portrait made me want this coin and of course, the reverse type. Verus was not, perhaps, an emperor to be remembered, but I like his portraits and his coinage.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>4. Domitian As - Fortuna</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397613[/ATTACH]</p><p>Domitian AD 81-96. Rome. As Æ. 27 mm, 10,73 g</p><p>RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Domitian 707. Old RIC 394</p><p>AD 90 - AD 91</p><p>IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XV CENS PER P P, bust of Domitian, laureate, right / FORTVNAE AVGVSTI S C, Fortuna standing left, holding rudder and cornucopiae</p><p><br /></p><p>When I first saw this coin in the auction I thought it will have a high price. Not obscenely high, but too high to buy it as a snack next to main targets.</p><p>Actually it was cheaper than expected and I was extremely glad for getting it. In hand the coin is spectacular and the patina chips don't disqualify it, for me.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>5. Trajan Denarius - Column</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397623[/ATTACH]</p><p>Trajan AD 98-117. Rome. Denarius AR. 19 mm, 2,60 g</p><p>RIC 292, RSC 558</p><p>Date Range: AD 112 - AD 114</p><p>IMP TRAIANO AVG GER DAC P M TR P COS VI P P, bust of Trajan, laureate, draped, right / S P Q R OPTIMO PRINCIPI, Column of Trajan surmounted with a statue of Trajan; two eagles at base and a wreath with spirals and dots on column</p><p><br /></p><p>For some collectors, probably a junk coin. For me, one of the coins I wanted to buy since I started collecting ancient coins. I know the Column denarii varieties are not rare and in an average condition should not cost an arm and a leg, but for some reason I haven't spotted one in the auctions I participate in. In July it happened. A (slightly) better than this one Column and a decent DAC CAP denarius. I wanted both and after checking the market I found out the prices should be affordable for these 2 examples.</p><p>*should* but didn't - as both the Column and the DAC CAP went over the roof even if my bids were way more than I expected, even in the pessimistic approach. Lost the DAC CAP. It was not as important as the Column for me so went for the Column. Failed again.</p><p>And to my big surprise, after a few lots I noticed this coin. Even if I browsed all the lots days before the auction, I didn't see this one. The surprise continued as I won it with a very low price.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>6. Gallienus Denarius - clasping hands</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397625[/ATTACH]</p><p>Gallienus AD 253-268. Rome. Antoninianus AR. 22 mm, 1,99 g</p><p>RIC V Gallienus (joint reign) 131; Cohen 125</p><p>Date: AD 253</p><p>IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG, bust of Gallienus, radiate, draped, right / CONCORDIA AVGG, two right hands clasped together</p><p><br /></p><p>You gotta love Gallienus if you're a collector. Tons of tons of coins with interesting reverses, there are lots of collectors who specialize on Zoo series and not only those.</p><p>But what needs to be said, at least from what I noticed, is that finding a Gallienus in good condition and well struck is not a (very) easy task.</p><p>Since this was acquired in the same auction as the previous coin, I was expecting a bidding war and I was not planning to take part in it. Not the case. I won a nice coin with an interesting reverse for a low price.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>7. Vespasian Denarius - Capricorns</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397626[/ATTACH]</p><p>Divus Vespasian after AD 79. Rome. Denarius AR. 19 mm, 2,71 g</p><p>RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 357;OLD RIC II Titus 63; RSC Titus 497</p><p>Date Range: AD 80 - AD 81</p><p>DIVVS AVGVSTVS VESPASIANVS, Head of Divus Vespasian, laureate, right / Capricorns, left and right, back to back, supporting round shield inscribed S C; globe, below</p><p><br /></p><p>Not rare, not in a good condition. But do I like it? Yep. Did I want it? oh yes.</p><p>For this one I love Vespasian's portrait, very expressive. And the "non standard" reverse even if I would have preferred (who wouldn't) a reverse with the shield and globe in better conservation.</p><p>I managed to lose 2 similar coins this year, before this one. First one was a beautiful example, with SC and globe fully visible, excellent portrait and the hammer price was low. But I was chasing other coins and I made a mistake by letting it go. Who knows, perhaps the winner would have paid more and more and more, but nobody knows. Bottom line, I let a beautiful coin slip. 1 month later, another auction, another house, another Vespasian with capricorns. Slightly worse. And it went for <b>double </b>amount.</p><p>Another month has passed, this appeared. Third time lucky as it is a type I wanted.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>8. Julia Titi - Ceres Dupondius</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397629[/ATTACH]</p><p>Julia Titi AD 80-81. Rome. Dupondius Æ. 28 mm, 11,55 g</p><p>RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 392</p><p>IVLIA IMP T AVG F AVGVSTA, bust of Julia Titi, draped, right; hair bundled high in front and wrapped in bun (sometimes small bun) in back /CERES AVGVST S C, Ceres standing left, holding corn-ears and torch</p><p><br /></p><p>This was the first time I broke my promise this years as I intended to stop buying since September. I was hoping it would go at a lower price than I got it. But judging after the market trend, it could have gone worse. Adding a coin from a rare Augusta is something I could not refuse. And the portrait is quite OK.</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>9. Titus Denarius - Venus</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397631[/ATTACH]</p><p>Titus AD 79-81. Rome. Denarius AR. 17 mm, 2,53 g</p><p>AD 79</p><p>RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 34; Old RIC II Titus 9; RSC 268</p><p>IMP TITVS CAES VESPASIAN AVG P M, head of Titus, laureate, right / TR P VIIII IMP XIIII COS VII P P, Venus standing right, resting on column, holding helmet and spear</p><p><br /></p><p>Few coins haunted me like this one when I first saw it. The portrait, the engraver's skills when carving the image of Venus and the overall look made my want this coin badly. The problems from the fields, the bad shape of the legends (this remains a mystery, as I saw coins with a lot more wear but with legends in better condition) just made me hope it will not attract too many bidders. And it didn't. Probably this was the coin I was the most happy about when hearing "going once, going twice, sold" (probably the neighbors also heard).</p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>10. Diva Faustina I Denarius - Consecratio</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1397641[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Diva Faustina I AD 140-141. Rome. Denarius AR. 17 mm, 2,56 g</p><p>RIC III Antoninus Pius 384a (denarius); RSC 175; BMC 473</p><p>AD 141</p><p>DIVA FAVSTINA, bust of Faustina I, draped, right, hair elaborately waved in several loops round head and drawn up and coiled on top. / CONSECRATIO, peacock, walking right, head turned back left</p><p><br /></p><p>Another very recent acquisition. It is not rare or in perfect conservation but it was a pleasant surprise as the coin looks better in hand than in the auction's house photos (I was expecting a worse reverse). This was bought in the same auction with the Titus and since there was still budget remaining, I could afford this one. Ticks a lot of boxes - empress, animal reverse and I can't say I dislike the normal circulation wear that left the details still there.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="ambr0zie, post: 8062828, member: 80952"]Although Christmas is coming in a month, I see other members have started providing their Top 10 coins. I have seen some beautiful examples already and I am sure I will see more. This year was great from a numismatic point of view. It has been also the first year where I concentrated 99.9999% on ancients only, learning more and more, ... buying more and more and the only 2 purchases not related to ancient coins were 2 modern banknotes I wanted for years, both cheap. It was very difficult to select only 10 coins - this is why I will create 2 lists, 1 for Roman Imperial coins and a list for Republican+Provincial+Greek. I bought a lot (mostly affordable coins) and it was difficult to select 10 coins only for Roman Imperial section. I had to relegate some coins that would have deserved a place, but I selected the coins I was extremely happy for getting and the ones I personally like the most. The order is the one I bought the coins in. Hope you will like them! 1. Trajan Denarius - Victory and DACICA shield [ATTACH=full]1397603[/ATTACH] Trajan AD 98-117. Rome Denarius AR 20 mm., 2,96 g. RIC II Trajan 130 Date Range: AD 103 - AD 111 IMP TRAIANO AVG GER DAC P M TR P, bust of Trajan, laureate, right, draped on left shoulder/ COS V P P S P Q R OPTIMO PRINC, Victory, naked to hips, standing right, left foot set on a step, inscribing DACICA on shield attached to palm-tree This coin is important for me as it is related to Dacia. I wanted to buy some coins connected to Dacia and I have a few (missing some DAC CAPs but every attempt to get one failed, prices going too high). Particularly like Trajan's portrait and the overall look of the coin. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 2. Lucilla Denarius - Venus Victrix [ATTACH=full]1397606[/ATTACH] Lucilla AD 164-182. Rome Denarius AR 18 mm., 2,89 g. RIC III Marcus Aurelius 786 Date Range: AD 164 - AD 180 LVCILLA AVGVSTA, bust of Lucilla, bare-headed, hair waved and fastened in a bun on back of head, draped, right / VENVS VICTRIX, Venus, draped with right breast bare, standing left, holding Victory in extended right hand and resting left hand on shield set on ground I try to get as many empresses as possible and this year a lot of new ones arrived in my albums. This was an impulse purchase but, even if the reverse is not perfect (although not bad!) the obverse was, for me, breathtaking, as the engraver did his job very good. I consider this one of the most beautiful coins in my collection. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 3. Divus Verus Denarius - Consecratio [ATTACH=full]1397611[/ATTACH] Divus Lucius Verus AD 169. Rome, Denarius AR, 18 mm., 2,70 g. RIC III Marcus Aurelius 596B; RSC 55, BMC 503 Date: AD 169 DIVVS VERVS, head of Lucius Verus, bare, right / CONSECRATIO, funeral pyre in four tiers, adorned with statues and garlands, quadriga on top The good portrait made me want this coin and of course, the reverse type. Verus was not, perhaps, an emperor to be remembered, but I like his portraits and his coinage. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 4. Domitian As - Fortuna [ATTACH=full]1397613[/ATTACH] Domitian AD 81-96. Rome. As Æ. 27 mm, 10,73 g RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Domitian 707. Old RIC 394 AD 90 - AD 91 IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XV CENS PER P P, bust of Domitian, laureate, right / FORTVNAE AVGVSTI S C, Fortuna standing left, holding rudder and cornucopiae When I first saw this coin in the auction I thought it will have a high price. Not obscenely high, but too high to buy it as a snack next to main targets. Actually it was cheaper than expected and I was extremely glad for getting it. In hand the coin is spectacular and the patina chips don't disqualify it, for me. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 5. Trajan Denarius - Column [ATTACH=full]1397623[/ATTACH] Trajan AD 98-117. Rome. Denarius AR. 19 mm, 2,60 g RIC 292, RSC 558 Date Range: AD 112 - AD 114 IMP TRAIANO AVG GER DAC P M TR P COS VI P P, bust of Trajan, laureate, draped, right / S P Q R OPTIMO PRINCIPI, Column of Trajan surmounted with a statue of Trajan; two eagles at base and a wreath with spirals and dots on column For some collectors, probably a junk coin. For me, one of the coins I wanted to buy since I started collecting ancient coins. I know the Column denarii varieties are not rare and in an average condition should not cost an arm and a leg, but for some reason I haven't spotted one in the auctions I participate in. In July it happened. A (slightly) better than this one Column and a decent DAC CAP denarius. I wanted both and after checking the market I found out the prices should be affordable for these 2 examples. *should* but didn't - as both the Column and the DAC CAP went over the roof even if my bids were way more than I expected, even in the pessimistic approach. Lost the DAC CAP. It was not as important as the Column for me so went for the Column. Failed again. And to my big surprise, after a few lots I noticed this coin. Even if I browsed all the lots days before the auction, I didn't see this one. The surprise continued as I won it with a very low price. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 6. Gallienus Denarius - clasping hands [ATTACH=full]1397625[/ATTACH] Gallienus AD 253-268. Rome. Antoninianus AR. 22 mm, 1,99 g RIC V Gallienus (joint reign) 131; Cohen 125 Date: AD 253 IMP C P LIC GALLIENVS AVG, bust of Gallienus, radiate, draped, right / CONCORDIA AVGG, two right hands clasped together You gotta love Gallienus if you're a collector. Tons of tons of coins with interesting reverses, there are lots of collectors who specialize on Zoo series and not only those. But what needs to be said, at least from what I noticed, is that finding a Gallienus in good condition and well struck is not a (very) easy task. Since this was acquired in the same auction as the previous coin, I was expecting a bidding war and I was not planning to take part in it. Not the case. I won a nice coin with an interesting reverse for a low price. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 7. Vespasian Denarius - Capricorns [ATTACH=full]1397626[/ATTACH] Divus Vespasian after AD 79. Rome. Denarius AR. 19 mm, 2,71 g RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 357;OLD RIC II Titus 63; RSC Titus 497 Date Range: AD 80 - AD 81 DIVVS AVGVSTVS VESPASIANVS, Head of Divus Vespasian, laureate, right / Capricorns, left and right, back to back, supporting round shield inscribed S C; globe, below Not rare, not in a good condition. But do I like it? Yep. Did I want it? oh yes. For this one I love Vespasian's portrait, very expressive. And the "non standard" reverse even if I would have preferred (who wouldn't) a reverse with the shield and globe in better conservation. I managed to lose 2 similar coins this year, before this one. First one was a beautiful example, with SC and globe fully visible, excellent portrait and the hammer price was low. But I was chasing other coins and I made a mistake by letting it go. Who knows, perhaps the winner would have paid more and more and more, but nobody knows. Bottom line, I let a beautiful coin slip. 1 month later, another auction, another house, another Vespasian with capricorns. Slightly worse. And it went for [B]double [/B]amount. Another month has passed, this appeared. Third time lucky as it is a type I wanted. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8. Julia Titi - Ceres Dupondius [ATTACH=full]1397629[/ATTACH] Julia Titi AD 80-81. Rome. Dupondius Æ. 28 mm, 11,55 g RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 392 IVLIA IMP T AVG F AVGVSTA, bust of Julia Titi, draped, right; hair bundled high in front and wrapped in bun (sometimes small bun) in back /CERES AVGVST S C, Ceres standing left, holding corn-ears and torch This was the first time I broke my promise this years as I intended to stop buying since September. I was hoping it would go at a lower price than I got it. But judging after the market trend, it could have gone worse. Adding a coin from a rare Augusta is something I could not refuse. And the portrait is quite OK. ------------------------------------------------------------------ 9. Titus Denarius - Venus [ATTACH=full]1397631[/ATTACH] Titus AD 79-81. Rome. Denarius AR. 17 mm, 2,53 g AD 79 RIC II, Part 1 (second edition) Titus 34; Old RIC II Titus 9; RSC 268 IMP TITVS CAES VESPASIAN AVG P M, head of Titus, laureate, right / TR P VIIII IMP XIIII COS VII P P, Venus standing right, resting on column, holding helmet and spear Few coins haunted me like this one when I first saw it. The portrait, the engraver's skills when carving the image of Venus and the overall look made my want this coin badly. The problems from the fields, the bad shape of the legends (this remains a mystery, as I saw coins with a lot more wear but with legends in better condition) just made me hope it will not attract too many bidders. And it didn't. Probably this was the coin I was the most happy about when hearing "going once, going twice, sold" (probably the neighbors also heard). ------------------------------------------------------------------ 10. Diva Faustina I Denarius - Consecratio [ATTACH=full]1397641[/ATTACH] Diva Faustina I AD 140-141. Rome. Denarius AR. 17 mm, 2,56 g RIC III Antoninus Pius 384a (denarius); RSC 175; BMC 473 AD 141 DIVA FAVSTINA, bust of Faustina I, draped, right, hair elaborately waved in several loops round head and drawn up and coiled on top. / CONSECRATIO, peacock, walking right, head turned back left Another very recent acquisition. It is not rare or in perfect conservation but it was a pleasant surprise as the coin looks better in hand than in the auction's house photos (I was expecting a worse reverse). This was bought in the same auction with the Titus and since there was still budget remaining, I could afford this one. Ticks a lot of boxes - empress, animal reverse and I can't say I dislike the normal circulation wear that left the details still there.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
(ambr0zie) Top 10 Roman Imperial Coins
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...