Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Vess1, post: 3665069, member: 13650&quot;]It looks like the OP is convinced its the S-34, left the ebay auction up and hasn&#039;t been back.&nbsp;&nbsp; I&#039;m certainly not any expert on EACs but the fact is NGC had it in hand and you paid good money for them to attribute it and they were not able to due to its condition.&nbsp; &nbsp; It&#039;s worn, corroded, scratched, and the date is gone.&nbsp; I can just barely make out the 4 on it from the photo.&nbsp;&nbsp; IMO, its not going to be an easy sell due to being so worn and unverifiable claims.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; The ethical thing to do would be to be honest about the debate and that NGC wouldn&#039;t grade or attribute it due to condition.&nbsp; Somebody will still want it.&nbsp; The offer will be lower than what you&#039;re asking but still be much more than what you have in it.&nbsp;&nbsp; That&#039;s what I&#039;d do.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>&nbsp; If you can&#039;t at least agree that it&#039;s attribution is not provable, then this is yet another case of somebody believing what they want to believe.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in