Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;NorthKorea, post: 1859279, member: 29643&quot;]I would suggest that you not have the strange issue where MS-63 grades are rarer than MS-65 grades or more common than XF-40 grades. I understand that you&#039;re attempting to do a population availability chart, but I think that the current format would do a disservice to a newer collector. Maybe you could switch around the words a bit too. I mean, visually, the chart seems to imply (in terms of availability, so less is better):</p><p><br /></p><p>Rare &gt; Scarce &gt; V Rare</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe it would be more streamlined to switch scarce and rare to be:</p><p><br /></p><p>Scarce &gt; Rare &gt; V Rare</p><p><br /></p><p>Overall, good contribution.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in