Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Am I looking at a dipped coin or a toned one?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 57534, member: 112"]Scans of coins are good for some things and bad for others. Typically, scans will wash out all luster unless you tilt the coin. But scans tend to show any and all marks that may not show up in digital pics. And while scans do not show luster - they do show breaks in luster.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now, that being said, I cannot say whether the coin has been dipped or not based on the pics. You comment that there is considerable luster under the toning on the reverse. That would indicate the coin may not have been dipped. But if there is no luster under the toning on the obverse - that would indicate that the coin probably has been dipped. You have the coin in hand - so only you can tell.</p><p><br /></p><p>As to the grade - I do not think the coin has been circulated due to lack of marks. And based on the pics the obverse is a uniform color which usually indicates no breaks in luster. But the reverse - the eagles breast shows plenty of dark grey on the high points and what appears to be rub marks in the fields. These are breaks in luster - but there's several ways that can happen. And in this case, if I had to guess, I'd say this coin was likely stored in a coin cabinet for a long period of time - reverse down. </p><p><br /></p><p>So technically the coin is uncirculated. But being a '79-S, it would never make MS65 without very good luster. And based on what you are telling us it does not have it.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="GDJMSP, post: 57534, member: 112"]Scans of coins are good for some things and bad for others. Typically, scans will wash out all luster unless you tilt the coin. But scans tend to show any and all marks that may not show up in digital pics. And while scans do not show luster - they do show breaks in luster. Now, that being said, I cannot say whether the coin has been dipped or not based on the pics. You comment that there is considerable luster under the toning on the reverse. That would indicate the coin may not have been dipped. But if there is no luster under the toning on the obverse - that would indicate that the coin probably has been dipped. You have the coin in hand - so only you can tell. As to the grade - I do not think the coin has been circulated due to lack of marks. And based on the pics the obverse is a uniform color which usually indicates no breaks in luster. But the reverse - the eagles breast shows plenty of dark grey on the high points and what appears to be rub marks in the fields. These are breaks in luster - but there's several ways that can happen. And in this case, if I had to guess, I'd say this coin was likely stored in a coin cabinet for a long period of time - reverse down. So technically the coin is uncirculated. But being a '79-S, it would never make MS65 without very good luster. And based on what you are telling us it does not have it.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
Am I looking at a dipped coin or a toned one?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...