Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;proofartoncircs, post: 921494, member: 25952&quot;]&lt;&lt;So I looked at my 68S and my 70D and both have mushy tail feathers, nothing like Stewart/Terry&#039;s example. Those would be considered Type A then?&gt;&gt; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Off hand, I don&#039;t know how the tailfeathers compare. I normally look at the sharp wings and if it&#039;s not a Type B, It is a Type M.&nbsp; I will check the tailfeathers in a few days when I can get back at my specimens.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>With these dates, we are now in the clad era and thus no more Type A which was silver only.&nbsp;&nbsp; There is a tendancy to call all clads type C, but there are many minor variations.&nbsp; And then we have the type M which I consider a significant variety.&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Your 1968 S sounds interesting.&nbsp; I am wondering if it is a non M non B which is rather scarce.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The 1970 D M occurs on 11.2 % of the 1970 D&#039;s in circulation in my experience.</p><p>The 1970 D M doubled dies appear on 4.4 %.&nbsp; I find these a bit annoying as they appear to be a weak M of different degrees of weakness.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in