Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;krispy, post: 2354778, member: 19065&quot;]I say &quot;that&#039;s no explanation&quot;. It&#039;s your way of taking the short cut out of spending the time to explain yourself and further a lazy leaning on your credentials to get away with it, but it certainly <i>explains</i> nothing about the problem.</p><p><br /></p><p>We all can say this piece &quot;doesn&#039;t look right&quot;, and it&#039;s the very reason for the creation of the thread in large part. It doesn&#039;t take much &quot;experience&quot; to point it out nor for even a novice to note something &quot;doesn&#039;t look right&quot; compared to other pieces. It does however, take experience and &quot;sharing (your) knowledge&quot; to be able to say more as to why, what you see that others might not be aware of, and what you know about other pieces that confirms it. It does take experience to educate others particularly if you are going to bother to chime in, and furthermore drop a caveat excusing you from doing so. </p><p><br /></p><p><i>What the problem is</i>, can help determine whether or not the problem can be reversed or improved upon via conservation or if the root cause of the problem was permanently damaging, and explaining your rational also advances the conversation.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in