Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Oldhoopster, post: 3600008, member: 84179&quot;]&quot;...sufficient secondary choice&quot;??? How can you say say this in with a straight face? If you would have done a little research on the test and read the previous threads with posts from&nbsp; leading error experts, materials science professionals, and people who have performed this test in industry explaining why they believe this can&#039;t occur, you would understand why.</p><p><br /></p><p>Next time, just use &quot;Bigfoot chewed on it&quot; or &quot;Aliens used it to jumper their dilithium crystals&quot; as explanations.&nbsp; Those have as much validity as your sufficient secondary choice.</p><p><br /></p><p>Regardless of the field of study, if you want to propose a new theory, it needs to be based on facts to allow for a discussion.&nbsp; You have chosen not to do thorough research, nor have you provided facts that stand up to basic scrutiny to support your assertions.</p><p><br /></p><p>Once again, there are people in CT that want to learn and deserve accurate information, not confused ramblings.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in