Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Alphabet game
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="cmezner, post: 9330970, member: 87809"]<b>R</b>udolph II, Holy <b>R</b>oman Emperor</p><p>A<b>R</b> Taler</p><p>Hall, 1607; mint master Ferdinand Leffler (?)</p><p><br /></p><p>41 mm, 28.24 g</p><p>Davenport 3005, KM 37.1 (var.);</p><p>For the attribution, KM 37.1 doesn’t list the year 1607 and the description of the clasp on the shoulder is different, but this seems to be arbitrary; it is remarkable that at the different auctions even the same auction house attributes this coinage differently, probably depending on who is doing the attribution. Given that I don’t have the literature, the most reasonable attribution for this Taler is to use the nearest attribution and add “var.”<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>The Latin double negation on the reverse “Nec Non” is used for affirmative reinforcement.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ob.: RVDOLPHVS II D:G:ROM:IM:SE:AV:GER:HVN:BOHREX •1607• below right shoulder; laureate and collared bust right; </p><p>Rv.: NECNON ARCHIDVCES AVS<img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie8" alt=":D" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />VCES BV:CO: TIROLIS, crowned coat of arms within chain of the Order of the Golden Fleece</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1522077[/ATTACH] </p><p style="text-align: center">[ATTACH=full]1522078[/ATTACH]</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="cmezner, post: 9330970, member: 87809"][B]R[/B]udolph II, Holy [B]R[/B]oman Emperor A[B]R[/B] Taler Hall, 1607; mint master Ferdinand Leffler (?) 41 mm, 28.24 g Davenport 3005, KM 37.1 (var.); For the attribution, KM 37.1 doesn’t list the year 1607 and the description of the clasp on the shoulder is different, but this seems to be arbitrary; it is remarkable that at the different auctions even the same auction house attributes this coinage differently, probably depending on who is doing the attribution. Given that I don’t have the literature, the most reasonable attribution for this Taler is to use the nearest attribution and add “var.”:) The Latin double negation on the reverse “Nec Non” is used for affirmative reinforcement. Ob.: RVDOLPHVS II D:G:ROM:IM:SE:AV:GER:HVN:BOHREX •1607• below right shoulder; laureate and collared bust right; Rv.: NECNON ARCHIDVCES AVS:DVCES BV:CO: TIROLIS, crowned coat of arms within chain of the Order of the Golden Fleece [ATTACH=full]1522077[/ATTACH] [CENTER][ATTACH=full]1522078[/ATTACH][/CENTER][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
Alphabet game
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...