Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 336986, member: 4920&quot;]Thanks very much&nbsp; LSM. I guess I&#039;ll have to say that&#039;s close enough. I&#039;d really love to see one of these on a &#039;67 or &#039;60&#039;s cent date, though, exclusive of the &#039;69&#039;s, which, again, were wimpy compared to the others of that decade. I&#039;m not trying to be pig-headed stubborn, here, and I sincerely appreciate your taking the time to post this example.</p><p><br /></p><p>And now to you, Hobo. As long as you mention rarity, let&#039;s talk about that for a minute, see if I can&#039;t further explain. Is snow rare? No. But it is when it happens in Palm Springs. And I&#039;m saying, if this is a greased error,&nbsp; I&#039;ve yet to see one, not only on a &#039;67 cent date, or any &#039;60&#039;s cent date, exclusive of &#039;69 cent dates, which, again, were weak to begin with, when compared to the others. And that&#039;s all I&#039;m saying. I know what a greased die is. I&#039;ve got scores of them, as do you, I&#039;m sure. But, if this is snow, is it snowing in Palm Springs? Assuming this is a greased die error, which, again, as you and the others point out are common, how common are they on &#039;60&#039;s cent dates, exclusive of the &#039;69 cent dates? Assuming this is a greased die error, that&#039;d be my question, then. You photograph snow in the middle of winter in New York City, that&#039;s no big deal. Palm Springs, that&#039;s different. Right?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in