Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 336434, member: 4920&quot;]Maybe it doesn&#039;t take much to impress me but I&#039;m really in love this one. She isn&#039;t the &#039;22-D weak mint mark, but I think I like her even better. This &quot;mishap&quot; (don&#039;t know yet whether to call it an error or die variety) didn&#039;t manifest below the date, but right in the middle of it. Here&#039;s another &#039;67 for comparison. As you may be aware, the dates in this decade, with the exception, perhaps, of the &#039;69 cents, were made as if they meant it. These were made to last. My Redbook says two die pairs produced the &#039;22-D weak mint mark, while a third die pair (die pair #2, evidenced by a strong reverse die) produced the more valuable one with the missing mint mark. I&#039;d sure like some similar provenance on this one, 67 dies, possible varieties, that kind of stuff, if you should know of anything. I mean, I&#039;d hate to think this is the only one out of the 3,000,000,000+ produced that year. Or rather, maybe I&#039;d like that. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in