Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;charley, post: 25722944, member: 5372&quot;]This is simply not going to happen.</p><p><br /></p><p>Comparing Chess programs to grading a coin is a strawman conversation.</p><p><br /></p><p>There is a Board. There are a set #of positions on the Board. There are a set number of Pieces and a set number and direction that the pieces can be positioned. Even if another strawman conversation using multi-level Chess is used as an example (Thanks a lot Star Trek for screwing things up) the mathematical solution is finite and there is no gee AI Grading for coins is where Chess was blahblah, is a waste of time and an insult to Einstein.</p><p><br /></p><p>AI will never be able to &quot;mimic&quot; the subjective nature of a human, and can not be trained/endowed/adapted/programmed/taught the ability, and Mr. Spock The Coin Evaluation Robot is not going to run around the Bourse Floor&nbsp; examining subjective graded pieces pronouncing&nbsp; &quot;that&#039;s logical&quot; will make it so.</p><p><br /></p><p>Maybe a case can be made on some humanoid level, I don&#039;t know, but I suspect if that happens, the song 2525 will be the national anthem, and humans will be melting humanoids rather than precious metals.</p><p><br /></p><p>I should be clear, I never and still don&#039;t buy that ANA got in right in the wayback machine and then sold themselves for 30 baubles. BS. A critical review of the the original ANA standards reveal the illogical logic of the conclusions, and THAT is what gave Birth to TPG.</p><p><br /></p><p>The subject is not even adaptable to the I&#039;m a Fan I&#039;m not a Fan position, because it does not exist, and will never be able to exist, because:</p><p>AI IS NOT HUMAN.</p><p><br /></p><p>My closing statement: mentally imagine an AI with glasses (made in China).</p><p><br /></p><p>Savvy?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in