Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;masterswimmer, post: 25708878, member: 102022&quot;]I don&#039;t believe AI grading would be horrible. I actually don&#039;t think it would be any different than submitting a coin to any major TPG company. Why, you ask? Good question. Let me explain.</p><p><br /></p><p>Grading isn&#039;t a science. It isn&#039;t mathematical.</p><p>We&#039;ve all seen a holdered coin in a slab that we don&#039;t agree with the grade. That&#039;s why we see people resubmit a coin in an NGC holder to PCGS for regrading. Or we see a coin in an ANACS holder and say it can do better in an NGC holder. And these are coins graded by humans. If humans can&#039;t agree on a grade, unanimously, how can a computer do it where everyone agrees unanimously?</p><p><br /></p><p>Another example. The existence of CGC. They base their entire business model on the fact that people don&#039;t agree on grading. They make millions of dollars confirming, with green beans, what someone else already did. How about the coveted gold bean? Coins that have a grade below what CGC &#039;dictates&#039; is the appropriate grade.</p><p><br /></p><p>Either way, CGC exists because people don&#039;t agree on a grade. Why would an AI computer grade be any less subjective?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in