Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Drago the Wolf, post: 1207303, member: 22476&quot;]<img src="http://www.amfproductions.com/images/new2.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><img src="http://www.amfproductions.com/images/new2-back.jpg" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Okay, hopefully these images will hold up when I post them up on this board. The guy posted the images he did on Where&#039;s George? And I found that thread while looking at currency subjects on Google. So, if these images hold up, THIS is what the Series 2009 $2 bill SHOULD be made to look like (There is a printing order for fiscal year 2012 for a printing of $2 bills which will presumably be Series 2009 like all other denominations) Except the color scheme on the front should feature bulish-green coloring with a blue scroll opened up saying &quot;The Declaration of Independence&quot; on it to the right of Thomas Jefferson on the front where, as you can see, this image is overprinted on a $5 bill. But you get the idea. The main purpose for a redesign of the $2 bill is NOT mainly for security reasons, but more so for the VISUALLY IMPAIRED (I myself, am visually impaired. My vision is 20/400 in BOTH eyes, and almost my whole family and extended family wears glasses), but that does not rule out a few security features, like at least, maybe a couple watermarks. But still, my eyes may or may not get worse, and with a huge dark numeral &quot;2&quot; on the back of an upgraded $2 bill as well as a &quot;big head&quot; Jefferson and old General Washington being the last of the &quot;small heads&quot; this will solve what I consider a fairly serious problem.</p><p><br /></p><p>What do you guys think? Should we rally in support of this?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in