Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 3979554, member: 56653&quot;]Thank you so much for adding your own. I&#039;d like for this thread to be an ongoing exploration on the earliest large AE1s of 351. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am also fully aware that at this time there is no definite standard for either diameter nor weight in the AE coinage, but we have the different dimensions rather visibly separated, possibly in two different denominations. You can notice that by the difference in die size and weight between the AE1 and AE2 of Magnentius/Decentius &quot;large chi-rho&quot; type, that seems to have been carried over to the coinage under Poemenius before being completely discontinued, possibly in the autumn of 353.</p><p><br /></p><p>Any more large Magnentius/Decentius specimens, Poemenius or instances of the different standards in weight and size between coins of the same type dating 351 to 353 is much welcome and appreciated.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thank you![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in