Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
After the Second Tetrarchy, 306 to 324
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4472009, member: 19463"]Around the turn of the new millennium, I was spending a lot of time talking to Victor Failmezger who was in the process of writing his book on late Roman bronzes. I started buying more of them and fewer Severans since I lacked anyone to talk to about them at that time. After a while I tired of so many coins having only minor differences and really spread out becoming a much more general collector. These are some of my favorites from the period in question.</p><p><br /></p><p>Ordinary in so many ways, I had to have this Maximinus II just because of the oval flan and odd eye. Rome mint was original in many ways.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112556[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>Also Rome was a not great condition Licinius I with the epwc mintmark. This was the only one I found for him and I never found a Licinius II. The ones for Constantine and his sons were hardly common but more so than the Licinii it seemed.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112557[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I liked the issues for Licinius II as a young Caesar that used a tiny portrait bust in keeping with his young age. This is from Heraclea which seemed to do a better job applying silver wash to the coins since there are so many that retain it today.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112558[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>For Constantine I, I like the issues in his name by Maxentius during a period they were friendly. This is a Rome mint AE1.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112562[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>My favorite Constantine is a very ordinary Rome mint AE3 severely double struck from a reverse die that had considerable damage from die clashing. The doubling of the incuse shadows proves that this was from die damage rather than a striking artifact. When I got it, many people were having trouble separating die clashes from the rare restruck brockages. This coin made a great illustration for my page on the subject.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112563[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>I liked the forehead hair style of this Kyzikos "12 1/2" follis for Constantine by Licinius. It also gained points in my book as from the same RIC issue as the coins of Martinian that I will never own.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1112564[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 4472009, member: 19463"]Around the turn of the new millennium, I was spending a lot of time talking to Victor Failmezger who was in the process of writing his book on late Roman bronzes. I started buying more of them and fewer Severans since I lacked anyone to talk to about them at that time. After a while I tired of so many coins having only minor differences and really spread out becoming a much more general collector. These are some of my favorites from the period in question. Ordinary in so many ways, I had to have this Maximinus II just because of the oval flan and odd eye. Rome mint was original in many ways. [ATTACH=full]1112556[/ATTACH] Also Rome was a not great condition Licinius I with the epwc mintmark. This was the only one I found for him and I never found a Licinius II. The ones for Constantine and his sons were hardly common but more so than the Licinii it seemed. [ATTACH=full]1112557[/ATTACH] I liked the issues for Licinius II as a young Caesar that used a tiny portrait bust in keeping with his young age. This is from Heraclea which seemed to do a better job applying silver wash to the coins since there are so many that retain it today. [ATTACH=full]1112558[/ATTACH] For Constantine I, I like the issues in his name by Maxentius during a period they were friendly. This is a Rome mint AE1. [ATTACH=full]1112562[/ATTACH] My favorite Constantine is a very ordinary Rome mint AE3 severely double struck from a reverse die that had considerable damage from die clashing. The doubling of the incuse shadows proves that this was from die damage rather than a striking artifact. When I got it, many people were having trouble separating die clashes from the rare restruck brockages. This coin made a great illustration for my page on the subject. [ATTACH=full]1112563[/ATTACH] I liked the forehead hair style of this Kyzikos "12 1/2" follis for Constantine by Licinius. It also gained points in my book as from the same RIC issue as the coins of Martinian that I will never own. [ATTACH=full]1112564[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
After the Second Tetrarchy, 306 to 324
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...