Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;John Anthony, post: 2335610, member: 42773&quot;][USER=75563]@ancientcoinguru[/USER]&nbsp; The latter. Both quaestors Tamios and Fulcinnius are spelled out on the coins, so they are definitely Roman Republic Provincials. MacKay&#039;s analysis, based on typology and the relationship of certain overstrikes to the history of the region, simply places them about 20 years earlier. I don&#039;t have the time to compose a synopsis at the moment, but like I said, MN #14 is cheap, and it&#039;s better to hear it from MacKay. <a href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/ancient_numismatic_enterprise/9/product/museum_notes_of_the_american_numismatic_society__volume_14_1968_xiv/556125/Default.aspx" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.vcoins.com/en/stores/ancient_numismatic_enterprise/9/product/museum_notes_of_the_american_numismatic_society__volume_14_1968_xiv/556125/Default.aspx" rel="nofollow">Here&#039;s one for 5 bucks</a>.</p><p><br /></p><p>You did a wise thing picking up this coin. They are not a dime-a-dozen, and an important part of RR history. They&#039;re very scarce in any condition.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in