Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;eddiespin, post: 656561, member: 4920&quot;]Sure, I get it. Hell, you&#039;re the one who talked me into it, and that was quite some time ago. As a general proposition, I believe it&#039;s best to let the coins alone. But, now, let&#039;s get down to concrete cases. There&#039;s a market out there that&#039;s accepting of cleaned coins, dipped coins, as well as &quot;doctored-toning,&quot; so long as that manipulation isn&#039;t too apparent. What do we do about that, ignore it? As such, in spite of the aforesaid, I&#039;m open to &quot;techniques,&quot; let&#039;s just call them, that &quot;make the grade,&quot; and are otherwise looked on as &quot;market acceptable.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>One more thing. It would be a mistake to take that to mean I&#039;m intolerant of more exacting standards. I&#039;m definitely not. Take it, rather, to mean, I&#039;m accepting of the reality of &quot;market acceptable&quot; cleaning, dipping and toning, as well as open to learning the foregoing &quot;techniques,&quot; to the extent I can.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in