Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A VERY tight brockage (2 coins for the price of 1!)
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2880304, member: 19463"]I believe using the term brockage here is incorrect but that certainly is a great coin. A brockage happens when a coin is struck normally but sticks,unnoticed, in the upper die. It then becomes the upper die for the striking of the next coin. That next coin is the brockage. </p><p><br /></p><p>This coin was two blanks that stuck together and were hammered together fusing them into one, doubly thick, coin. If pried apart, I would not expect to see a brockage design on one half and a normal coin on the other. I would expect to see something more like the Valerian antoninianus below which, I believe was like the OP coin but separated from its partner rather than being fused with it (not hit as hard???). </p><p>[ATTACH=full]690247[/ATTACH] </p><p>I agree with John Anthony and Kermit the frog. It is cool and <span style="color: #00b300">it isn't easy being green</span>. </p><p><br /></p><p>I am going way out on a limb and mentioning a question that has long bothered me and not been discussed in polite literature. There are many brockages. Each brockage was caused by a coin sticking in the die and being used as the die for the brockage coin. Should we not, then, have coins that were used to produce the brockages? What would they look like? I say the original design would be a bit damaged or flattened by being pressed into that second flan. I also say that the entire flan should be spread out a bit by being struck again making the flan flatter; cracks are a possibility. What I would expect would look a bit like the Septimius Severus Emesa mint denarius below. The reverse is boldly struck and the flan is flattened and cracked. The obverse is a bit mushy as it it might have been pushed into something reducing its detail. Certainly there are other answers for why this coin might look like it does but this coin is the best match for what I might expect a brockage mother to look like. I can not prove it. I would love to see other candidates for coins that made brockages or hear other answers explaining the phenomenon. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]690248[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2880304, member: 19463"]I believe using the term brockage here is incorrect but that certainly is a great coin. A brockage happens when a coin is struck normally but sticks,unnoticed, in the upper die. It then becomes the upper die for the striking of the next coin. That next coin is the brockage. This coin was two blanks that stuck together and were hammered together fusing them into one, doubly thick, coin. If pried apart, I would not expect to see a brockage design on one half and a normal coin on the other. I would expect to see something more like the Valerian antoninianus below which, I believe was like the OP coin but separated from its partner rather than being fused with it (not hit as hard???). [ATTACH=full]690247[/ATTACH] I agree with John Anthony and Kermit the frog. It is cool and [COLOR=#00b300]it isn't easy being green[/COLOR]. I am going way out on a limb and mentioning a question that has long bothered me and not been discussed in polite literature. There are many brockages. Each brockage was caused by a coin sticking in the die and being used as the die for the brockage coin. Should we not, then, have coins that were used to produce the brockages? What would they look like? I say the original design would be a bit damaged or flattened by being pressed into that second flan. I also say that the entire flan should be spread out a bit by being struck again making the flan flatter; cracks are a possibility. What I would expect would look a bit like the Septimius Severus Emesa mint denarius below. The reverse is boldly struck and the flan is flattened and cracked. The obverse is a bit mushy as it it might have been pushed into something reducing its detail. Certainly there are other answers for why this coin might look like it does but this coin is the best match for what I might expect a brockage mother to look like. I can not prove it. I would love to see other candidates for coins that made brockages or hear other answers explaining the phenomenon. [ATTACH=full]690248[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A VERY tight brockage (2 coins for the price of 1!)
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...