Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Conder101, post: 2012483, member: 66&quot;]They may be errors, and I believe the description that they are overstruck on reverse brockages may also be correct.&nbsp; However his description that they are from the Davy&#039;s collection Lots 104 and 105 is NOT correct.&nbsp; Those lots were 1800 half cents.&nbsp; These two coins DO NOT appear in the Davy&#039;s collection.&nbsp; That SERIOUSLY hurts his credibility.</p><p><br /></p><p>On the left hand coin you can see the remnants of an incuse FO and part of the wreath creating the &quot;damage&quot; at 6:00.&nbsp; On the right hand coin you can see the remains of the bases of an incuse HAL in the area where the right hand wreath stem should be, part of the wreath running through the fraction, and the center dot and N of CENT in the leaf clusters just to the right of the leaf bow.&nbsp; What is disturbing is that I don&#039;t see traces of the raised images of the reverse on the devices of the other side.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Really?&nbsp; Then when you send them the same coin again and they give it a different opinion, which opinion was the authoritative one?&nbsp; The current one or their original opinion they THEY are now disagreeing with?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in