Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
A theory regarding silver in rolls...
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 2349045, member: 27832"]Basically, they go for more because that's what people are willing to pay. I can <i>guess</i> at a couple of reasons, though.</p><p><br /></p><p>First, half dollars tend to retain more silver in the face of wear. As a coin circulates, metal wears away, at a rate proportional to the coin's <i>surface area</i> -- and the larger the coin, the larger its volume (and thus its mass/weight) relative to its surface area. So, dimes lose weight fastest, followed by quarters, halves, and dollars.</p><p><br /></p><p>Besides, recent half dollars are likely to be less heavily circulated -- I've seen very few Franklins worn down to anything less than F, and 1964 Kennedys hardly circulated at all. I've got some slick Barber halves and older Walkers that have lost substantial weight (more than 5%), but those coins still carry a higher numismatic base value.</p><p><br /></p><p>This is even more pronounced for silver dollars. First, they contain more silver than $1.00 worth of dimes, quarters or halves as minted -- equivalent to about $1.07 worth of smaller change. Second, they lose weight less rapidly than smaller change. Most importantly, though, both Morgan and Peace dollars are very heavily collected, meaning there's more demand -- and any <i>earlier</i> type of dollar coin (Trade, Seated, Bust) still carries a numismatic value that dwarfs its bullion value.</p><p><br /></p><p>Finally, 90% silver <i>in general</i> is trading at a premium these days. At the moment, <a href="http://www.coinflation.com/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.coinflation.com/" rel="nofollow">Coinflation</a> quotes 90% coinage's silver value at 11.15x face value. <a href="http://www.providentmetals.com/sell-to-us.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.providentmetals.com/sell-to-us.html" rel="nofollow">Provident</a>, a large online dealer, will <i>pay</i> 12.79x face value for your silver ($1000 minimum, or a bit less than $100 face value); they'll <i>sell</i> it back to you for 13.86x. This isn't always the case, but it has been for most of the last few years. Local dealers, with smaller volume, need a bigger spread to make money; they'll pay you less than Provident, and charge you more if you're buying, especially for small quantities.</p><p><br /></p><p>(I notice that Provident doesn't pay extra for half dollars, but does <i>charge</i> extra for them -- 15.29x for circulated 1964 Kennedys, 14.57x for Franklins, and 14.21x for Walkers. I'm a bit surprised at that. They don't list prices for bulk dimes or quarters.)[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="-jeffB, post: 2349045, member: 27832"]Basically, they go for more because that's what people are willing to pay. I can [I]guess[/I] at a couple of reasons, though. First, half dollars tend to retain more silver in the face of wear. As a coin circulates, metal wears away, at a rate proportional to the coin's [I]surface area[/I] -- and the larger the coin, the larger its volume (and thus its mass/weight) relative to its surface area. So, dimes lose weight fastest, followed by quarters, halves, and dollars. Besides, recent half dollars are likely to be less heavily circulated -- I've seen very few Franklins worn down to anything less than F, and 1964 Kennedys hardly circulated at all. I've got some slick Barber halves and older Walkers that have lost substantial weight (more than 5%), but those coins still carry a higher numismatic base value. This is even more pronounced for silver dollars. First, they contain more silver than $1.00 worth of dimes, quarters or halves as minted -- equivalent to about $1.07 worth of smaller change. Second, they lose weight less rapidly than smaller change. Most importantly, though, both Morgan and Peace dollars are very heavily collected, meaning there's more demand -- and any [I]earlier[/I] type of dollar coin (Trade, Seated, Bust) still carries a numismatic value that dwarfs its bullion value. Finally, 90% silver [I]in general[/I] is trading at a premium these days. At the moment, [URL='http://www.coinflation.com/']Coinflation[/URL] quotes 90% coinage's silver value at 11.15x face value. [URL='http://www.providentmetals.com/sell-to-us.html']Provident[/URL], a large online dealer, will [I]pay[/I] 12.79x face value for your silver ($1000 minimum, or a bit less than $100 face value); they'll [I]sell[/I] it back to you for 13.86x. This isn't always the case, but it has been for most of the last few years. Local dealers, with smaller volume, need a bigger spread to make money; they'll pay you less than Provident, and charge you more if you're buying, especially for small quantities. (I notice that Provident doesn't pay extra for half dollars, but does [I]charge[/I] extra for them -- 15.29x for circulated 1964 Kennedys, 14.57x for Franklins, and 14.21x for Walkers. I'm a bit surprised at that. They don't list prices for bulk dimes or quarters.)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
A theory regarding silver in rolls...
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...