Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;ambr0zie, post: 5336449, member: 80952&quot;]Thank you all. </p><p>Regarding Mr Goldsborough&#039;s article, what I can say is that in these cases you just cannot be sure - he also mentioned he cannot say he&#039;s certain.</p><p>This is why I always appreciate a different opinion - [USER=24314]@Insider[/USER] - I am glad when I see cases like you described, and even if in my particular case I don&#039;t think I will clarify the situation, I am glad it is not quite a die match, as my coin was marked as fake, die match, on a different place. </p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=110350]@DonnaML[/USER] - thank you and once again thanks for creating the initial thread</p><p>I am not sure about what I will decide about returning it - if I am not sure if it&#039;s a fake, I will prefer to keep it... I think.</p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=89687]@ominus1[/USER] - that is my exact opinion about the subject <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=115035]@DiomedesofArgos[/USER] - good spot, that one is even more obvious than what I spotted, so this proves that ... this is not a die match with a coin that is considered a fake but one cannot guarantee that it is really a fake. Not much but at least not a clear verdict.</p><p><br /></p><p>At least I can say for sure that ... my example cannot unanimously be considered a fake.</p><p><br /></p><p>I think I will choose to avoid any Apollonia Pontica drachm unless a seller provides a clear provenance date, let&#039;s say something before 1960-70, but this is somewhat unlikely.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in