Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;JeffC, post: 5132737, member: 90913&quot;][USER=101855]@johnmilton[/USER] Thanks for this. I enjoyed reading it and have some questions (no rush - reply when you have time).</p><p><br /></p><p>1. Today, is the Treasury Secretary still the one who ultimately approves a design?</p><p><br /></p><p>2. Referring to:</p><p><br /></p><p>But what then was the initial motif? (Unless I&#039;m mistaken and you were referring to Type I as the original, in comparison with Type II?)</p><p><br /></p><p>3.&nbsp; I checked throuh my Red Book but might have missed it.&nbsp; Would it be correct to say that the reverse design of Charles Barber is the only one that encroaches upon, and partially obscures, the Country name (i.e. the &quot;E&quot; in UNITED and the &quot;E&quot; in AMERICA)?&nbsp; I can&#039;t find another U.S. coin that did this.</p><p><br /></p><p>4.&nbsp; Is Roger Burdette&#039;s research regarding the <i>real</i> reason for the SLQ design change from Type I to Type II generally accepted now?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in