Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A silly reason for buying a coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2789254, member: 19463"]That pretty well sums up my feelings on the matter as well. I might add that weird extends to wanting an MS67 for twice the price of an MS66, wanting a coin because the 'relative nobody' that issued it made some list of rulers, paying a hundred times as much for one flyspeck but not another --- in short any reason that is not <u>my</u> reason. I like the swan and would buy a coin like that. I love that hand on snake and hope each of us here finds one in the stock of a dealer who does not see it as anything special so he was selling it for half price. There may not be another in existence. I don't know. There may be a mint sack with a thousand. </p><p><br /></p><p>Three of my five most silly coin purchases are technical oddities. </p><p><br /></p><p>5. Magnentius - Flip over restruck brockage (one obverse, two normal reverses, one incuse reverse). This probably would not be the choice of a collector who wanted just one Magnentius. Silly old me would buy another coin just like this one. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]647401[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>4. Constantius Gallus overstruck on Constatius II but aligned well enough that it almost looks like the Caesar has a diadem on the portrait. This was a $5 coin because of its low grade. I would love to have this coin in a nice smooth VF. The chances on such a good alignment is small, very small. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]647402[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>3. I did not buy this coin because I wanted a Tranquillina from Tomis. I liked the fact that the mint dug out the denomination mark on the reverse die (not on the coin but on the die). I would love to find this same reverse die before it was modified. Buying THAT coin would not be silly at all, IMHO. Most people would not notice or would call it a damaged coin. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]647405[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>2. My second silliest purchase was buying a lot of 34 junk denarii because I wanted this Julia Domna. I was aware of the coin because it was listed in all of the standard books from one that still resides in the French National Collection. 'My Favorite Coin' is a Septimius Severus with this reverse legend but, on his, Victory is walking. I wanted the Domna with VICTOR IVST AVG seated. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]647431[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>1. My #1 silliest purchase was buying a lot of 32 oddball denarii mostly because I wanted this Julia Domna. </p><p>[ATTACH=full]647408[/ATTACH] </p><p>Yes, as a matter of fact, it is a die duplicate of #2 but has better surfaces and <u>much</u> worse centering losing the most important letters of the reverse legend. When it comes to silly, is it sillier to buy a duplicate that is not even a certain upgrade? In this case I got several coins I wanted to keep but several others have appeared in JA's sales and some were not sold the first time around. I paid nearly $1000 for 32 coins (including fees and postage) and may end up with more in this one than I thought. That is OK. Sometimes, when you can't have the only specimen, you have to go for 2 of 3. Will I buy the next one I see? Will I buy the whole bag some dealer has in his back room? Now that really would be silly! We all buy what we must. I consider this the Rodney Dangerfield of ancient coins. The catalogers who write the standard references consider this a mule with reverse of Septimius Severus or Pescennius Niger because their precious theories won't accept a woman on a coin with a military (victory) reverse or a man with Venus (the lot included one of those, too). The fact that neither of those gentlemen issued VICTOR IVST AVG with the seated victory means nothing. Maybe theirs were all lost to time and Julia's survived. Meanwhile, I consider it appropriate that they should spend time with someone who believes in them. </p><p><br /></p><p>Is there a prize for being the silliest collector? Would I beat the person who paid that 3750 CHF price for the snake in hand? This is a hobby to me. It is supposed to be fun.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="dougsmit, post: 2789254, member: 19463"]That pretty well sums up my feelings on the matter as well. I might add that weird extends to wanting an MS67 for twice the price of an MS66, wanting a coin because the 'relative nobody' that issued it made some list of rulers, paying a hundred times as much for one flyspeck but not another --- in short any reason that is not [U]my[/U] reason. I like the swan and would buy a coin like that. I love that hand on snake and hope each of us here finds one in the stock of a dealer who does not see it as anything special so he was selling it for half price. There may not be another in existence. I don't know. There may be a mint sack with a thousand. Three of my five most silly coin purchases are technical oddities. 5. Magnentius - Flip over restruck brockage (one obverse, two normal reverses, one incuse reverse). This probably would not be the choice of a collector who wanted just one Magnentius. Silly old me would buy another coin just like this one. [ATTACH=full]647401[/ATTACH] 4. Constantius Gallus overstruck on Constatius II but aligned well enough that it almost looks like the Caesar has a diadem on the portrait. This was a $5 coin because of its low grade. I would love to have this coin in a nice smooth VF. The chances on such a good alignment is small, very small. [ATTACH=full]647402[/ATTACH] 3. I did not buy this coin because I wanted a Tranquillina from Tomis. I liked the fact that the mint dug out the denomination mark on the reverse die (not on the coin but on the die). I would love to find this same reverse die before it was modified. Buying THAT coin would not be silly at all, IMHO. Most people would not notice or would call it a damaged coin. [ATTACH=full]647405[/ATTACH] 2. My second silliest purchase was buying a lot of 34 junk denarii because I wanted this Julia Domna. I was aware of the coin because it was listed in all of the standard books from one that still resides in the French National Collection. 'My Favorite Coin' is a Septimius Severus with this reverse legend but, on his, Victory is walking. I wanted the Domna with VICTOR IVST AVG seated. [ATTACH=full]647431[/ATTACH] 1. My #1 silliest purchase was buying a lot of 32 oddball denarii mostly because I wanted this Julia Domna. [ATTACH=full]647408[/ATTACH] Yes, as a matter of fact, it is a die duplicate of #2 but has better surfaces and [U]much[/U] worse centering losing the most important letters of the reverse legend. When it comes to silly, is it sillier to buy a duplicate that is not even a certain upgrade? In this case I got several coins I wanted to keep but several others have appeared in JA's sales and some were not sold the first time around. I paid nearly $1000 for 32 coins (including fees and postage) and may end up with more in this one than I thought. That is OK. Sometimes, when you can't have the only specimen, you have to go for 2 of 3. Will I buy the next one I see? Will I buy the whole bag some dealer has in his back room? Now that really would be silly! We all buy what we must. I consider this the Rodney Dangerfield of ancient coins. The catalogers who write the standard references consider this a mule with reverse of Septimius Severus or Pescennius Niger because their precious theories won't accept a woman on a coin with a military (victory) reverse or a man with Venus (the lot included one of those, too). The fact that neither of those gentlemen issued VICTOR IVST AVG with the seated victory means nothing. Maybe theirs were all lost to time and Julia's survived. Meanwhile, I consider it appropriate that they should spend time with someone who believes in them. Is there a prize for being the silliest collector? Would I beat the person who paid that 3750 CHF price for the snake in hand? This is a hobby to me. It is supposed to be fun.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A silly reason for buying a coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...