Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A silly reason for buying a coin?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 2788942, member: 57495"]A weak strike almost never weighs in the favour of a coin, but it was at least partially the reason why this coin ended up with me. Issues as common as L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi's Social War denarii need something a little different to make me want a particular example, and here it was the combination of the unusual control symbol (swan with a broken neck??), and a little bit of striking weakness that turned the symbol into a somewhat ominous apparition looming out in the upper left field of the reverse... creepy, but in a good way <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie1" alt=":)" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />. </p><p><br /></p><p>Other than that, the toning is also quite lovely, and to my mind, the historical significance of this quintessential RR issue often results in one getting decent bang for one's coin buck. </p><p><br /></p><p>I guess we all have our own personal and occasionally odd reasons for buying the coins we do. If you have any, please share 'em (and that applies to your Piso Frugi denarii, Social War denarii, swan coins, cool control symbols, etc). </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]647282[/ATTACH] </p><p><b>ROMAN REPUBLIC</b></p><p>AR Denarius. 3.97g, 18.8mm. Rome mint, AD 90. L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi, moneyer. Crawford 340/1. O: Laureate head of Apollo right. R: Naked horseman galloping right, holding whip; above, swan and below, L PISO FRVGI / ROMA.</p><p><i>Ex E.E. Clain-Stefanelli Collection</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="zumbly, post: 2788942, member: 57495"]A weak strike almost never weighs in the favour of a coin, but it was at least partially the reason why this coin ended up with me. Issues as common as L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi's Social War denarii need something a little different to make me want a particular example, and here it was the combination of the unusual control symbol (swan with a broken neck??), and a little bit of striking weakness that turned the symbol into a somewhat ominous apparition looming out in the upper left field of the reverse... creepy, but in a good way :). Other than that, the toning is also quite lovely, and to my mind, the historical significance of this quintessential RR issue often results in one getting decent bang for one's coin buck. I guess we all have our own personal and occasionally odd reasons for buying the coins we do. If you have any, please share 'em (and that applies to your Piso Frugi denarii, Social War denarii, swan coins, cool control symbols, etc). [ATTACH=full]647282[/ATTACH] [B]ROMAN REPUBLIC[/B] AR Denarius. 3.97g, 18.8mm. Rome mint, AD 90. L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi, moneyer. Crawford 340/1. O: Laureate head of Apollo right. R: Naked horseman galloping right, holding whip; above, swan and below, L PISO FRVGI / ROMA. [I]Ex E.E. Clain-Stefanelli Collection[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A silly reason for buying a coin?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...