Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A second Tetradrachm for the collection
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 7975994, member: 110226"]That's a nice coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>I don't think the coin has a silver wash or has been electro plated. I have a silver washed follis of Maximinanus, Siscia Mint, 286-310 AD, that has the silver wash more or less intact, and its appearance is quite distinctive, with its bright silver surfaces contrasting with some parts of the lettering and rim exposing the much more base metal beneath.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1384137[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>Nor do I think that the coin was plated. Such plating would tend to make the legend and devices fuzzier - there would be a loss of detail.</p><p><br /></p><p>Comparing our coins, it is clear that they were produced with different dies. You coin definitely has the "billon look" - a kind of grayish green. My coin does have a more silver look to it, so I think it has a higher silver content. Based on my experience with coins of known fineness, such as the Mexican silver pesos of 1918 and the 1920's, I would guess that my coin might have a silver content of 60% to 75%. </p><p><br /></p><p>There is an electronic device that measures metal content, but it is very expensive and I am not sure about the accuracy of the measurements. I could try to perform a specific gravity test, but my homemade approach to this is not very satisfactory.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="robinjojo, post: 7975994, member: 110226"]That's a nice coin. I don't think the coin has a silver wash or has been electro plated. I have a silver washed follis of Maximinanus, Siscia Mint, 286-310 AD, that has the silver wash more or less intact, and its appearance is quite distinctive, with its bright silver surfaces contrasting with some parts of the lettering and rim exposing the much more base metal beneath. [ATTACH=full]1384137[/ATTACH] Nor do I think that the coin was plated. Such plating would tend to make the legend and devices fuzzier - there would be a loss of detail. Comparing our coins, it is clear that they were produced with different dies. You coin definitely has the "billon look" - a kind of grayish green. My coin does have a more silver look to it, so I think it has a higher silver content. Based on my experience with coins of known fineness, such as the Mexican silver pesos of 1918 and the 1920's, I would guess that my coin might have a silver content of 60% to 75%. There is an electronic device that measures metal content, but it is very expensive and I am not sure about the accuracy of the measurements. I could try to perform a specific gravity test, but my homemade approach to this is not very satisfactory.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A second Tetradrachm for the collection
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...