Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
A second 3 Cent Silver to debate
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2672290, member: 24314"]TypeCoin971793, posted: "The toning may be muting it." <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Technically, it does. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie50" alt=":happy:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> However, in an effort not to leave out what I consider the <span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 102)"> "<b><span style="color: #ff0000">obvious</span></b></span>" (cause of mint luster); I'll add more "fluff" and write that until the toning progresses to the darker stages, any underlying luster is still visible though in some cases it is muted. In a further effort not to leave any more "common knowledge" <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie104" alt=":yawn:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> out of this post: I'm sure you must know that some shades of toning can make a coin with virtually no original surface look PL as the light is reflected from the toning layer rather than the dull metal! </span>"And coin luster is not just "reflection of light from a surface." It is the light being reflected..." <b><i><span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">FROM THE SURFACE</span></i></b> <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">as I originally posted (no matter what that surface looks like including the nonsense about a polished surface</span><span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 102)">). "...</span>and scattered by microscopic ridges etched into the die by metal flow." <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Perhaps you might have also considered a fresh - never used die - in your "clarification." A die that is polished and has not formed microscopic ridges. Coins struck from that die will still have luster that was not caused by radial wear! </span>"I am not seeing this very well in the photos." <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">As I wrote, there is mint luster all over the untoned areas of this coin.</span> "This does not mean it isn't there." <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Look again, it is.</span></p><p><br /></p><p><span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">As for [USER=27832]@-jeffB[/USER]</span> - "...was just poking fun at your ambiguity, which means you were the unhelpful one here." <span style="color: rgb(179, 0, 0)">Note that he has not defended the snarky <b>way</b> he posted something that could have been a very valid and educational question concerning "luster" both mint made and artificial. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie3" alt=":(" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" /> I hope I answered that completely this time.</span>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Insider, post: 2672290, member: 24314"]TypeCoin971793, posted: "The toning may be muting it." [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Technically, it does. :happy: However, in an effort not to leave out what I consider the [COLOR=rgb(102, 0, 102)] "[B][COLOR=#ff0000]obvious[/COLOR][/B][/COLOR]" (cause of mint luster); I'll add more "fluff" and write that until the toning progresses to the darker stages, any underlying luster is still visible though in some cases it is muted. In a further effort not to leave any more "common knowledge" :yawn: out of this post: I'm sure you must know that some shades of toning can make a coin with virtually no original surface look PL as the light is reflected from the toning layer rather than the dull metal! [/COLOR]"And coin luster is not just "reflection of light from a surface." It is the light being reflected..." [B][I][COLOR=rgb(255, 0, 0)]FROM THE SURFACE[/COLOR][/I][/B] [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]as I originally posted (no matter what that surface looks like including the nonsense about a polished surface[/COLOR][COLOR=rgb(102, 0, 102)]). "...[/COLOR]and scattered by microscopic ridges etched into the die by metal flow." [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Perhaps you might have also considered a fresh - never used die - in your "clarification." A die that is polished and has not formed microscopic ridges. Coins struck from that die will still have luster that was not caused by radial wear! [/COLOR]"I am not seeing this very well in the photos." [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]As I wrote, there is mint luster all over the untoned areas of this coin.[/COLOR] "This does not mean it isn't there." [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Look again, it is.[/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]As for [USER=27832]@-jeffB[/USER][/COLOR] - "...was just poking fun at your ambiguity, which means you were the unhelpful one here." [COLOR=rgb(179, 0, 0)]Note that he has not defended the snarky [B]way[/B] he posted something that could have been a very valid and educational question concerning "luster" both mint made and artificial. :( I hope I answered that completely this time.[/COLOR][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
US Coins Forum
>
A second 3 Cent Silver to debate
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...