Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Bobs Tavern Arm, post: 3574829, member: 104407&quot;]Huh I left strange photos.... anyway, how a 1963 seems “realistic” comes from how a surrogate was needed. A 1962 could not provide die depth without tin, because every other model they could use (1961 and before) contained tin. So you create a penny a year early and use that lack of tin to create a die for 1962.</p><p>That’s how I “realistically” justify that.&nbsp; An inner ear IS higher starting in 1962. Every 1961 compared to a 1962 so far has proven its validity. It’s easy to see examples between these two.... they’re the most common of coin sights.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in