Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A question on 1982 nickel die changes?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="quarter-back, post: 1787256, member: 47022"]First, to the OP. I have found both reverses on Philadelphia and Denver coins, but only the later hub version on the proofs. That doesn't mean they are not out there, I just haven't found one.</p><p> </p><p>I have tried for years to make sense of this issue. I have looked in detail at every 72 and 82 I have found over 4 years of nickel roll searching, and I use e-bay as one of my sources for research as it gives me a lot of images to look at. I have looked at hundreds (if not more) and have never found an 82 coin that I can definitely ID as a an obverse Type of 77. The reverses are easy. The same is true for the 70-72 issues. The reverse is easy, but I find the obverses to be more of a continuum than a bimodal distribution. I even tried assembling a set of many dozens of images from 68-74 so i could be confident of being able to ID the end points. I've seen previous discussion that, at least for early 70's nickels, the original report may have been in error. If anyone has any definitive die markers (especially to provide estimates of the number of dies involved), hints, etc., for the "mules", publishing them would be a great service to the vast dozen or so collectors that actually care about these things.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="quarter-back, post: 1787256, member: 47022"]First, to the OP. I have found both reverses on Philadelphia and Denver coins, but only the later hub version on the proofs. That doesn't mean they are not out there, I just haven't found one. I have tried for years to make sense of this issue. I have looked in detail at every 72 and 82 I have found over 4 years of nickel roll searching, and I use e-bay as one of my sources for research as it gives me a lot of images to look at. I have looked at hundreds (if not more) and have never found an 82 coin that I can definitely ID as a an obverse Type of 77. The reverses are easy. The same is true for the 70-72 issues. The reverse is easy, but I find the obverses to be more of a continuum than a bimodal distribution. I even tried assembling a set of many dozens of images from 68-74 so i could be confident of being able to ID the end points. I've seen previous discussion that, at least for early 70's nickels, the original report may have been in error. If anyone has any definitive die markers (especially to provide estimates of the number of dies involved), hints, etc., for the "mules", publishing them would be a great service to the vast dozen or so collectors that actually care about these things.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Coin Chat
>
A question on 1982 nickel die changes?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...