Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
A pseudo-Christian cult that almost overthrew the Qing Dynasty of China
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="manymore, post: 2239561, member: 17118"]Loong Siew -- your little charade is over.</p><p><br /></p><p>You made a critical mistake when you revealed that you bought the coin at a Nobel Numismatics auction in Australia.</p><p><br /></p><p>I did a search of past auctions and found your coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>For the benefit of those who may not have followed this thread, the <i>tian guo tong bao</i> coin under discussion is among the 50 rarest Chinese coins. There are less than 20 authentic coins known to exist.</p><p><br /></p><p>The last authentic specimen sold 10 years ago for $22,400. If an authentic coin were to come to auction now, it is estimated that it would sell for more than $313,000.</p><p><br /></p><p>Loong Siew has been touting his credentials as an experienced and major Chinese coin collector. He has insisted that his coin is absolutely genuine. He has even implied that David Hartill is familiar with his coin and that the auction house that sold the coin has validated it as genuine with a lifetime guarantee.</p><p><br /></p><p>Loong Siew insists that Nobel Numismatics is a prestigious auction house comparable to Heritage and Spinks.</p><p><br /></p><p>Clearly with an extremely rare and authentic Chinese coin coming up for auction at such a major auction house, all the serious and well-to-do Chinese numismatists in the world would be bidding for the coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>With that as the background, please view <a href="https://www.noble.com.au/auctions/lot?id=338838" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.noble.com.au/auctions/lot?id=338838" rel="nofollow">Loong Siew's coin</a> at the Nobel Numismatics auction webpage. The auction took place in July of this year in Sydney.</p><p><br /></p><p>You will first notice that the color of the coin is different from the image Loong Siew used in this thread on CoinTalk. I don't know if this was done to intentionally deceive or not. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and just say that he is a poor photographer.</p><p><br /></p><p>If you compare the coins you will see that they are absolutely identical. Every little scratch on the rim, every little rim dent, every discolored spot, etc. is identical. So there is no question that it is the same coin.</p><p><br /></p><p>Now remembering that the authoritative Baidu Encyclopedia in China estimates that an authentic version of this coin would now sell for more than $313,000, do you see what Loong Siew actually paid for this "authentic" and "very rare" coin?</p><p><br /></p><p><u>$280</u> ($400 Australian)</p><p><br /></p><p>Clearly 100% fake!</p><p><br /></p><p>Even more unfathomable is that the "prestigious" Nobel Numismatics identified the "coin" correctly noting that it is "very fine and rare".</p><p><br /></p><p>Did you notice what this auction house estimated this very rare and desirable coin would sell for?</p><p><br /></p><p><u>$140</u> ($200 Australian)</p><p><br /></p><p>Yes, that means that the auction house knew the coin was a fake, too.</p><p><br /></p><p>Also, some poor soul must have bid against Loong Siew and the fake coin ended up selling for twice what the auction house estimated it would go for.</p><p><br /></p><p>Loong Siew has been pretending that he is major Chinese numismatist who moves in the same circles as well-respected experts. He claims he has "rare" Chinese coins and does not hesitate to belittle anyone who dares question him.</p><p><br /></p><p>I regret that I wasted time doing research in an attempt to help him understand that the coin is an obvious fake.</p><p><br /></p><p>I especially feel bad that he lied by hinting that David Hartill, one of our finest and most respected Chinese numismatists, had seen the coin and that it was genuine.</p><p><br /></p><p>I also feel bad for all the other forum members who he deceived on other CoinTalk threads with his fake "posthumous" Qing dynasty sycee and his fake "last emperor of the Ming dynasty" horse coin. I won't even bother addressing why these coins are also fakes.</p><p><br /></p><p>But most of all I feel sorry for Loong Siew who apparently must get some satisfaction in pretending to be someone he's not and having a "rare" coin collection that he knows consists of fakes.</p><p><br /></p><p>I will agree with him on one thing, though. It's time to end this thread.</p><p><br /></p><p>Gary[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="manymore, post: 2239561, member: 17118"]Loong Siew -- your little charade is over. You made a critical mistake when you revealed that you bought the coin at a Nobel Numismatics auction in Australia. I did a search of past auctions and found your coin. For the benefit of those who may not have followed this thread, the [I]tian guo tong bao[/I] coin under discussion is among the 50 rarest Chinese coins. There are less than 20 authentic coins known to exist. The last authentic specimen sold 10 years ago for $22,400. If an authentic coin were to come to auction now, it is estimated that it would sell for more than $313,000. Loong Siew has been touting his credentials as an experienced and major Chinese coin collector. He has insisted that his coin is absolutely genuine. He has even implied that David Hartill is familiar with his coin and that the auction house that sold the coin has validated it as genuine with a lifetime guarantee. Loong Siew insists that Nobel Numismatics is a prestigious auction house comparable to Heritage and Spinks. Clearly with an extremely rare and authentic Chinese coin coming up for auction at such a major auction house, all the serious and well-to-do Chinese numismatists in the world would be bidding for the coin. With that as the background, please view [URL='https://www.noble.com.au/auctions/lot?id=338838']Loong Siew's coin[/URL] at the Nobel Numismatics auction webpage. The auction took place in July of this year in Sydney. You will first notice that the color of the coin is different from the image Loong Siew used in this thread on CoinTalk. I don't know if this was done to intentionally deceive or not. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and just say that he is a poor photographer. If you compare the coins you will see that they are absolutely identical. Every little scratch on the rim, every little rim dent, every discolored spot, etc. is identical. So there is no question that it is the same coin. Now remembering that the authoritative Baidu Encyclopedia in China estimates that an authentic version of this coin would now sell for more than $313,000, do you see what Loong Siew actually paid for this "authentic" and "very rare" coin? [U]$280[/U] ($400 Australian) Clearly 100% fake! Even more unfathomable is that the "prestigious" Nobel Numismatics identified the "coin" correctly noting that it is "very fine and rare". Did you notice what this auction house estimated this very rare and desirable coin would sell for? [U]$140[/U] ($200 Australian) Yes, that means that the auction house knew the coin was a fake, too. Also, some poor soul must have bid against Loong Siew and the fake coin ended up selling for twice what the auction house estimated it would go for. Loong Siew has been pretending that he is major Chinese numismatist who moves in the same circles as well-respected experts. He claims he has "rare" Chinese coins and does not hesitate to belittle anyone who dares question him. I regret that I wasted time doing research in an attempt to help him understand that the coin is an obvious fake. I especially feel bad that he lied by hinting that David Hartill, one of our finest and most respected Chinese numismatists, had seen the coin and that it was genuine. I also feel bad for all the other forum members who he deceived on other CoinTalk threads with his fake "posthumous" Qing dynasty sycee and his fake "last emperor of the Ming dynasty" horse coin. I won't even bother addressing why these coins are also fakes. But most of all I feel sorry for Loong Siew who apparently must get some satisfaction in pretending to be someone he's not and having a "rare" coin collection that he knows consists of fakes. I will agree with him on one thing, though. It's time to end this thread. Gary[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
World Coins
>
A pseudo-Christian cult that almost overthrew the Qing Dynasty of China
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...