Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A pair of new RR bronze additions
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="red_spork, post: 3530164, member: 74282"]I recently worked out a deal with [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER] to purchase a few bronzes he picked up in a group lot. The main one I wanted was the Cr. 41/6e semis, shown first below, a very rare type that I wanted as an upgrade to my lesser example of the type. The Cr. 162/4 "MAT" semis was a ride-along that was offered so cheaply that I saw no reason to decline it since I was already paying for shipping.</p><p><br /></p><p>This semis, cataloged by Crawford as 41/6e comes from one of the earliest series of struck semisses as the larger denominations were transitioning from cast to struck bronzes. Crawford only cited a single example of the type in RRC but a few more have come to light since then and in Roberto Russo broke up this issue into two series, one earlier and at a slightly higher weight standard and one later and at a lower weight standard and Andrew McCabe in his <a href="https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013" rel="nofollow">paper on anonymous bronzes</a> refers to these two series as A1 and A2, respectively. <a href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/newp-two-more-second-punic-war-era-republican-bronzes.271118/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.cointalk.com/threads/newp-two-more-second-punic-war-era-republican-bronzes.271118/">My previous example of the type</a> has dies linking it to the "A1" group but it is of a very low weight, much lower than either group should theoretically be, and is somewhat of an enigma in that regard, whereas this new example has dies and is of a weight standard that places it squarely in group "A2". I had originally considered this new coin as simply an upgrade and planned to sell my older example but I've since decided to hold onto both for now, at least until I can better make sense of my previous example:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]937970[/ATTACH]</p><p>Roman Republic Æ Semis(31.05g, 33mm, 11h). Anonymous post-semilibral series, 215-212 BC. Rome mint. Laureate head of Saturn right, S behind/Prow of galley right, S above, ROMA below. McCabe Anonymous A2.Sm.1; Crawford 41/6e.</p><p>Ex [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER], 5/6/2019, ex Karel de Geus auction 46, 29-30 October 2018, lot 2201(part), ex Rob Rueb Collection(d. 1987)</p><p><br /></p><p>This second coin is a semis with monogram "MAT", generally attributed to a moneyer of the gens Matiena. The semis only ever comes with the "MAT" above the prow but some of the smaller fractions come with "MAT" either above or to the right of the prow, in styles generally referred to as "thick" and "slender" letters. This distinction is not normally made about the semis but I kind of wonder if it shouldn't be. My semis, while worn, has a clear monogram above the prow that that is small and neatly engraved. Compare with <a href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156151&partId=1&searchText=mat+semis&page=1" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156151&partId=1&searchText=mat+semis&page=1" rel="nofollow">this example</a> from the British Museum which has a relatively much larger monogram and a different overall reverse style. Interestingly, the silver of this series also comes in multiple styles with multiple monogram placements. Perhaps it is simply an artifact of multiple engravers working on this issue at the mint, I don't really have photos of enough coins to fully form an opinion yet, but this series certainly deserves further study.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]937974[/ATTACH]</p><p>Roman Republic Æ Semis(14.33g, 21mm, 2h), Anonymous("MAT" series), 179-170 BC. Laureate head of Saturn right; behind, S/Prow right; above, MAT monogram; before, S; below, ROMA. Crawford 162/4</p><p>Ex [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER], 5/6/2019, ex Karel de Geus auction 46, 29-30 October 2018, lot 2201(part), ex Rob Rueb Collection(d. 1987)</p><p><br /></p><p>As always, feel free to share anything relevant[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="red_spork, post: 3530164, member: 74282"]I recently worked out a deal with [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER] to purchase a few bronzes he picked up in a group lot. The main one I wanted was the Cr. 41/6e semis, shown first below, a very rare type that I wanted as an upgrade to my lesser example of the type. The Cr. 162/4 "MAT" semis was a ride-along that was offered so cheaply that I saw no reason to decline it since I was already paying for shipping. This semis, cataloged by Crawford as 41/6e comes from one of the earliest series of struck semisses as the larger denominations were transitioning from cast to struck bronzes. Crawford only cited a single example of the type in RRC but a few more have come to light since then and in Roberto Russo broke up this issue into two series, one earlier and at a slightly higher weight standard and one later and at a lower weight standard and Andrew McCabe in his [URL='https://www.academia.edu/15757344/Andrew_McCabe_The_Anonymous_Struck_Bronze_Coinage_of_the_Roman_Republic_in_Essays_in_Honour_of_Roberto_Russo_Witschonke_van_Alfen_eds_2013']paper on anonymous bronzes[/URL] refers to these two series as A1 and A2, respectively. [URL='https://www.cointalk.com/threads/newp-two-more-second-punic-war-era-republican-bronzes.271118/']My previous example of the type[/URL] has dies linking it to the "A1" group but it is of a very low weight, much lower than either group should theoretically be, and is somewhat of an enigma in that regard, whereas this new example has dies and is of a weight standard that places it squarely in group "A2". I had originally considered this new coin as simply an upgrade and planned to sell my older example but I've since decided to hold onto both for now, at least until I can better make sense of my previous example: [ATTACH=full]937970[/ATTACH] Roman Republic Æ Semis(31.05g, 33mm, 11h). Anonymous post-semilibral series, 215-212 BC. Rome mint. Laureate head of Saturn right, S behind/Prow of galley right, S above, ROMA below. McCabe Anonymous A2.Sm.1; Crawford 41/6e. Ex [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER], 5/6/2019, ex Karel de Geus auction 46, 29-30 October 2018, lot 2201(part), ex Rob Rueb Collection(d. 1987) This second coin is a semis with monogram "MAT", generally attributed to a moneyer of the gens Matiena. The semis only ever comes with the "MAT" above the prow but some of the smaller fractions come with "MAT" either above or to the right of the prow, in styles generally referred to as "thick" and "slender" letters. This distinction is not normally made about the semis but I kind of wonder if it shouldn't be. My semis, while worn, has a clear monogram above the prow that that is small and neatly engraved. Compare with [URL='https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1156151&partId=1&searchText=mat+semis&page=1']this example[/URL] from the British Museum which has a relatively much larger monogram and a different overall reverse style. Interestingly, the silver of this series also comes in multiple styles with multiple monogram placements. Perhaps it is simply an artifact of multiple engravers working on this issue at the mint, I don't really have photos of enough coins to fully form an opinion yet, but this series certainly deserves further study. [ATTACH=full]937974[/ATTACH] Roman Republic Æ Semis(14.33g, 21mm, 2h), Anonymous("MAT" series), 179-170 BC. Laureate head of Saturn right; behind, S/Prow right; above, MAT monogram; before, S; below, ROMA. Crawford 162/4 Ex [USER=87271]@AnYangMan[/USER], 5/6/2019, ex Karel de Geus auction 46, 29-30 October 2018, lot 2201(part), ex Rob Rueb Collection(d. 1987) As always, feel free to share anything relevant[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A pair of new RR bronze additions
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...