Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;seth77, post: 3565799, member: 56653&quot;]Considering the period: the aftermath of the Sixth Crusade, the involvement of Bohemond in the War of the Lombards and the rise of the Mamluk threat, these last issues of the denier for Antioch seem so unlikely. But viewing them in the context of the billon coinages of Jerusalem -- both the royal immobilized and the baronial -- and Tripoli, they have are very likely and necessary. </p><p><br /></p><p>If this small diameter and low weight series was minted around and even after the loss of the City of Antioch, to circulate alongside the denier of Tripoli at a parity with it, it would make so much sense for the monetary history of the Crusader states during their final decades.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in