Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Aethelred, post: 2571166, member: 81808&quot;]I will defer to those with more knowledge of this era than me, but I suggest there may be a flaw with this theory. My reason for thinking this is that Caracalla introduced the Antoninianus in c. 215, after his assassination it continued to be issued for a brief time under Macrinus and Elagabalus, but ceased to be minted by about mid way in the latter&#039;s reign (c. 219-220). It would then be almost 20 years before it was issued again (AD 238).[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in