Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A mule antoninianus of Volusian
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 5401247, member: 89514"]Doug,</p><p><br /></p><p>I doubt we will differ much on these four coins.</p><p><br /></p><p>All of them are official, the first two from the mint of Alexandria, 3-4 from the main Syrian mint, Antioch, which Pescennius Niger probably brought along on his march to northwestern Asia Minor to oppose Septimius, but which was captured there by Septimius after defeating Niger at Cyzicus and Nicaea, causing him to retreat to Cilicia. So from late 193-early 194 on, that mint was striking for Septimius and Domna rather than Niger. Your two Domnas are early judging from their style, fabric, and rev. types, so were probably struck while Septimius, his army, and his captured mint were still in Asia Minor north of the Taurus Mountains. After defeating Niger for good later in 194 at the battle of Issus, Septimius may have relocated this Antioch mint to Laodicea, as part of his punishment of Antioch for supporting Niger.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Eastern denarius mints were much more careless than Rome in copying rev. types and combining them with obverses. AEQVIT AVG TR P COS II was a type of Pertinax's, though Alexandria had struck it earlier with the enigmatic legend AEQVITAS II. Neither legend, of course, was used for Septimius at Rome. VENERI VICTRICI was Domna's first rev. type at Rome; Alexandria struck it for both Domna and Septimius. VICTOR IVST AVG with Victory advancing was a type of Niger's, oddly carried on by the "Antioch" mint for Septimius, whose names didn't include Justus. Your seated type with the same legend is known only for Domna, though as you write on your website a corresponding denarius for Septimius may turn up someday. At Rome, Victory was generally a type of emperors only, not empresses. The same could be said of the Fides type, oddly joined by Antioch with a Bonus Eventus legend; here the added title <i>II COS shows that the die was engraved with Septimius in mind. So four regular coins, but we can't explain with certainty how some of the rev. types were selected, and whether the use of Septimius' types by Domna and of Domna's types by Septimius was intentional or merely careless.</i>[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="curtislclay, post: 5401247, member: 89514"]Doug, I doubt we will differ much on these four coins. All of them are official, the first two from the mint of Alexandria, 3-4 from the main Syrian mint, Antioch, which Pescennius Niger probably brought along on his march to northwestern Asia Minor to oppose Septimius, but which was captured there by Septimius after defeating Niger at Cyzicus and Nicaea, causing him to retreat to Cilicia. So from late 193-early 194 on, that mint was striking for Septimius and Domna rather than Niger. Your two Domnas are early judging from their style, fabric, and rev. types, so were probably struck while Septimius, his army, and his captured mint were still in Asia Minor north of the Taurus Mountains. After defeating Niger for good later in 194 at the battle of Issus, Septimius may have relocated this Antioch mint to Laodicea, as part of his punishment of Antioch for supporting Niger. The Eastern denarius mints were much more careless than Rome in copying rev. types and combining them with obverses. AEQVIT AVG TR P COS II was a type of Pertinax's, though Alexandria had struck it earlier with the enigmatic legend AEQVITAS II. Neither legend, of course, was used for Septimius at Rome. VENERI VICTRICI was Domna's first rev. type at Rome; Alexandria struck it for both Domna and Septimius. VICTOR IVST AVG with Victory advancing was a type of Niger's, oddly carried on by the "Antioch" mint for Septimius, whose names didn't include Justus. Your seated type with the same legend is known only for Domna, though as you write on your website a corresponding denarius for Septimius may turn up someday. At Rome, Victory was generally a type of emperors only, not empresses. The same could be said of the Fides type, oddly joined by Antioch with a Bonus Eventus legend; here the added title [I]II COS shows that the die was engraved with Septimius in mind. So four regular coins, but we can't explain with certainty how some of the rev. types were selected, and whether the use of Septimius' types by Domna and of Domna's types by Septimius was intentional or merely careless.[/I][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A mule antoninianus of Volusian
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...