Log in or Sign up
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A mule antoninianus of Volusian
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Claudius_Gothicus, post: 5188794, member: 116315"]One of the good things about being a specialist in a certain numismatic field is that, if you search well and have a bit of luck on your side, you can stumble upon an interesting type that was misattributed or ignored by the other bidders. That's exactly what happened to me today, when I snagged this coin for little over the starting bid:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]1213923[/ATTACH]</p><p>Volusian (251-253), Antoninianus, Antioch mint, 1st emission.</p><p><br /></p><p>Obverse: IM C V AF GAL VEND VOLVSIANO AVG, radiate, draped and cuirassed bust right, seen from behind;</p><p><br /></p><p>Reverse: AEQVITAS AVGG, Aequitas standing left, holding scales and cornucopia;</p><p><br /></p><p>The auction house had misattributed it as the common RIC 166 from the Rome mint, but it clearly isn't due to the difference in legend and portrait style. So, why is this coin special, then? Now, at first glance it simply appears to be an unlisted variation of RIC 225, omitting the "P" from "IMP" (something which I believe only happened twice, the second time on the coinage of Vabalathus), but that wouldn't be the whole story, would it? To answer this question we need to also take a look at the reverse: all known antoniniani of Volusian from the Antioch mint feature the reverse legend "AEQVITAS AVG"; for his father Trebonianus Gallus, however, alongside the standard "AEQVITAS AVG", they also struck some coins with the legend "AEQVITAS AVGG", featuring two "G" ; this coin is identified in RIC as RIC 81 and seems to be quite rare, I only found one on the internet, on the "Four Bad Years" website (the example on Wildwinds has the wrong photo), and it's a reverse die match to this coin. So, from this analysis, in which [USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] helped me greatly in sorting through the existing reference works, we can deduce that we are looking at an apparently unique and unpublished mule combining an obverse of Volusian with a reverse of Gallus, although, to be fair, mules of this time period are relatively common, featuring plenty of different obverse and reverse combinations. Anyway, I can't wait to hold this coin in my hands!</p><p><br /></p><p>Post your mules/hybrid coins, your Antioch antoniniani of Volusian or anything else you feel is relevant.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Claudius_Gothicus, post: 5188794, member: 116315"]One of the good things about being a specialist in a certain numismatic field is that, if you search well and have a bit of luck on your side, you can stumble upon an interesting type that was misattributed or ignored by the other bidders. That's exactly what happened to me today, when I snagged this coin for little over the starting bid: [ATTACH=full]1213923[/ATTACH] Volusian (251-253), Antoninianus, Antioch mint, 1st emission. Obverse: IM C V AF GAL VEND VOLVSIANO AVG, radiate, draped and cuirassed bust right, seen from behind; Reverse: AEQVITAS AVGG, Aequitas standing left, holding scales and cornucopia; The auction house had misattributed it as the common RIC 166 from the Rome mint, but it clearly isn't due to the difference in legend and portrait style. So, why is this coin special, then? Now, at first glance it simply appears to be an unlisted variation of RIC 225, omitting the "P" from "IMP" (something which I believe only happened twice, the second time on the coinage of Vabalathus), but that wouldn't be the whole story, would it? To answer this question we need to also take a look at the reverse: all known antoniniani of Volusian from the Antioch mint feature the reverse legend "AEQVITAS AVG"; for his father Trebonianus Gallus, however, alongside the standard "AEQVITAS AVG", they also struck some coins with the legend "AEQVITAS AVGG", featuring two "G" ; this coin is identified in RIC as RIC 81 and seems to be quite rare, I only found one on the internet, on the "Four Bad Years" website (the example on Wildwinds has the wrong photo), and it's a reverse die match to this coin. So, from this analysis, in which [USER=75937]@Roman Collector[/USER] helped me greatly in sorting through the existing reference works, we can deduce that we are looking at an apparently unique and unpublished mule combining an obverse of Volusian with a reverse of Gallus, although, to be fair, mules of this time period are relatively common, featuring plenty of different obverse and reverse combinations. Anyway, I can't wait to hold this coin in my hands! Post your mules/hybrid coins, your Antioch antoniniani of Volusian or anything else you feel is relevant.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Coin Talk
Home
Forums
>
Coin Forums
>
Ancient Coins
>
A mule antoninianus of Volusian
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Competitions
Competitions
Quick Links
Competition Index
Rules, Terms & Conditions
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Showcase
Showcase
Quick Links
Search Items
Most Active Members
New Items
Directory
Directory
Quick Links
Directory Home
New Listings
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Sponsors
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...